Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CARTER Jane (Jane P (Hall) Carter) P. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 2 | FAGAN Margaret | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 22% |
| 3 | FOX Viveka R. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 3 | VINES Kristin A. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 5 | BOTELHO Lynn A. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 6 | KASS Sara A. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 7 | VASHISHT Suparna | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 8 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% |
| 10 | FERGUSON Diane F. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 35% | 7% |
| 11 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 12 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 13 | LYTLE Darby A. | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | AMISTOSO Jeanne | - | 2% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | CHAYKINA Natalie V. | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | RATCHFORD Mary Jo | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | WICK Jana H. | - | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 18 | MORRISON Monica L. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 1% |
| 19 | KERR Margaret E. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 20 | TRELOAR Allison F. | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 22 | BROWN Rachel (Rachel Brown) F. | - | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 23 | TASKER Monisha B. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 24 | SMITH Kristina | 2% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 25 | MORO Diana | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 26 | HUSAIN Amber | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 27 | JONES Ann L. | 9% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.