Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | V V D V V | V V V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 3 | KAROLAK Dale W. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | SZOKOLAY Robert E. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 5 | SEGAL Mark N. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | CRAVEY Donald (Don) N. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 7 | HENZLER Thomas A. | D D D V V D | V V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 8 | RICHARDS Dick | D D D V D | V V V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 9 | ALEXANDER Chuck | V V V V V D | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 10 | MASE James B. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | SCOTT George R. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 12 | GELNAW William (Gypsy) H. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 13 | EVANS Allen L. | V V D V V | V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 14 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | MOREAU John A. | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 16 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | V V D V D V | V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 17 | SCHNEIDER Charles (Charlie) J. | D V V V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 18 | WHEELER Mark C. | V V V V D | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 19 | SNYDER John W. | V D V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 20 | WILSON Victor T. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 21 | TIERNEY Luke | D D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 22 | KLEIN Johannes | V V D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 23 | RESS Michael A. | V D V D V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 24 | LOGAN Mark P. | V D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 25 | NEWSOME James L. | D V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 26 | MILLIGAN Bruce C. | D V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 26 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | V D V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 28 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 29 | ANDERSON Michael L. | V D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 30 | SWANN William A. | V D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 31 | MARIANI Lou | D V V D D | V D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
| 32 | WAGMAN Robert S. | D D V D D | V D | 4.0 | 1 | -3.0 |
| 33 | MCDARBY Michael B. | V V D V D V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 34 | KING Charles M. | V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 35 | SCHREIBER Gyula S. | D V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 36 | SIMS Wallace F. | D D V V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 37 | SHIFER Aleksandr | D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 38 | ROSENTHAL Paul E. | V V D D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 39 | MONES Robert (Bob) J. | D V V D D D | D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 40 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | D D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 41 | HUNKER Frederick | V D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 42 | CHELNITSKY Yuriy | D V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 43 | BADIOLI Carlo | D D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 44 | HARBER Mike | D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 45 | REDDING Russel M. | D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 46 | GROSS Louis A. | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 47 | STONE Ken | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 48 | TKACH Robert W. | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 49 | CORINALDI Greg | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 50 | HOUST Michael D. | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 51 | GRAVIS Martin V. | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 52 | KLUCZYNSKI Mike k. | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 53 | FRANK William N. | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.