Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NORMILE Jon M. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
| 2 | ILIEV Velizar K. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 65% | 16% |
| 3 | REES Daniel I. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 3 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 5 | PERKA Michael | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 19% |
| 6 | WATRALL Rick | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% |
| 7 | HAYENGA Gary M. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 8 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 9 | JOHNSON Jeff | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 10 | SUPONYA Sergey | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 11 | TRAIN Timothy D. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 12 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 13 | FREY Wayne N. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 14 | SUMLER Jeffery | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | BALESTRACCI Chris | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | SAYLOR David A. | 1% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 17 | LANG Markus | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 18 | SCHINDLER Sergey M. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 41% | 37% | 3% |
| 19 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 62% |
| 20 | POULIQUEN Benoit (Ben) | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 21 | CLARK Timothy J. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | GUMAGAY Paul | - | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | FRANK Fred | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 2% |
| 24 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 25 | PARTE Aidan | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | SCHULTZ Douglas B. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | HARRINGTON Joseph | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 28 | HITCHCOCK David | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 29 | STEWART Robert | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 12% | - |
| 30 | BEITTEL David F. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 32 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | HERGERT Earl | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 34 | TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. | 3% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | WALLACE Patric | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 36 | ESVAL Kevin | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | 2% |
| 37 | DAVIS Andrew | - | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | JONES John (Mike) M. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 39 | NGUYEN Cuong T. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
| 40 | KOKENGE Chad | - | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 41 | MAHMOUD Hossam | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | CROUCH William John (John) | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 43 | MRAK Michael R. | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 44 | POPOVICI Alexander M. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 45 | AMRINE JR Terry L. | - | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 46 | GILLESPIE Jeremy W. | 24% | 47% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | BLANCHARD Aaron (Sam) S. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | MILLS Tim A. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 48 | PITZEL John E. | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | DICKSON Tim | 1% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | MALLECK Robert H. | 7% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | GREGORY Dean | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | POWERS Bill | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 53 | WILLIAMS Richard | 7% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | MCBRIDE Steve | 1% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 56 | GAURIAT Olivier | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 57 | REID Michael | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | SWANSON Dave | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 60 | BECK Brian C. | 1% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 61 | LIPTON Michael D. | 6% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 63 | PIERRO Roger | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 64 | CHEN Chang-Rung | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 65 | LIU Chien-ye | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | MANOUKIAN David | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 67 | LEE Richard U. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | LAHMAN Richard | 8% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 69 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | 1% | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 70 | CONSTANTINE George C. | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | STEPHENS Rick W. | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 72 | ROGERS John D. | 54% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 73 | VONA Gary J. | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | KELBLEY Jay | 16% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | PREUD'HOMME Xavier A. | 60% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 76 | GIOCOLO David | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.