Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NORMILE Jon M. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | ILIEV Velizar K. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | REES Daniel I. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 5 | PERKA Michael | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 6 | WATRALL Rick | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | HAYENGA Gary M. | V V V V D D | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 8 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | D D D V D | V V V V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 9 | JOHNSON Jeff | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 10 | SUPONYA Sergey | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | TRAIN Timothy D. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 12 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 13 | FREY Wayne N. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 14 | SUMLER Jeffery | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 15 | BALESTRACCI Chris | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 16 | SAYLOR David A. | V D V V D D | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 17 | LANG Markus | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 18 | SCHINDLER Sergey M. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 19 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | D V V V V V | V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 20 | POULIQUEN Benoit (Ben) | V D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 21 | CLARK Timothy J. | V V V D V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 22 | GUMAGAY Paul | V V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 23 | FRANK Fred | V D V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 24 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | D V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 25 | PARTE Aidan | V V V V D D | V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 26 | SCHULTZ Douglas B. | V V D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 27 | HARRINGTON Joseph | V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 28 | HITCHCOCK David | V V D D D V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 29 | STEWART Robert | V D V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 30 | BEITTEL David F. | D D V V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 31 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | V V V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 32 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | V D D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 33 | HERGERT Earl | V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 34 | TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. | V D D V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 35 | WALLACE Patric | D V V V V D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 36 | ESVAL Kevin | D V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 37 | DAVIS Andrew | D V D V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 38 | JONES John (Mike) M. | D V D D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 39 | NGUYEN Cuong T. | V D D V V D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 40 | KOKENGE Chad | D D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 41 | MAHMOUD Hossam | D D V V D V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 42 | CROUCH William John (John) | V D D V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 43 | MRAK Michael R. | D D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 44 | POPOVICI Alexander M. | V V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 45 | AMRINE JR Terry L. | D V V D D V | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 46 | GILLESPIE Jeremy W. | D V V D V D | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 47 | BLANCHARD Aaron (Sam) S. | V D D D D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 48 | MILLS Tim A. | D V V D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 48 | PITZEL John E. | D V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 50 | DICKSON Tim | V D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 51 | MALLECK Robert H. | D V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 52 | GREGORY Dean | D V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 53 | POWERS Bill | D V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 53 | WILLIAMS Richard | D V V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 55 | MCBRIDE Steve | V D D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 56 | GAURIAT Olivier | V D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 57 | REID Michael | D D D V D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 59 | SWANSON Dave | V D D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 60 | BECK Brian C. | D D D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 61 | LIPTON Michael D. | V D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 62 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | V D D D D D | V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 63 | PIERRO Roger | D D V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 64 | CHEN Chang-Rung | D D D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| 65 | LIU Chien-ye | D V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 66 | MANOUKIAN David | D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 67 | LEE Richard U. | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 68 | LAHMAN Richard | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 69 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | V D D D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 70 | CONSTANTINE George C. | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 71 | STEPHENS Rick W. | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 72 | ROGERS John D. | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 73 | VONA Gary J. | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 74 | KELBLEY Jay | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 75 | PREUD'HOMME Xavier A. | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 76 | GIOCOLO David | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.