The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Div I-A Women's Saber

Tuesday, July 2, 2019 at 3:00 PM

Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 YUN Joy 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 26%
2 CHEN Erin Y. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 29%
3 ZEGERS Anneke E. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 31%
3 SULLIVAN Caroline E. 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 23%
5 WOZNIAK Kelli 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 37%
6 LIU Rachel 100% 99% 91% 65% 29% 6%
7 HOOGENDOORN Levi 100% 94% 70% 33% 8% 1%
8 LIN Audrey J. 100% 99% 90% 66% 32% 8% 1%
9 GULATI Ria 100% 97% 81% 48% 17% 2%
10 HOOGENDOORN Sterre 100% 100% 96% 80% 48% 17% 2%
11 YODER Bridget H. 100% 91% 62% 26% 6% -
12 BEALE Zoe M. 100% 99% 92% 69% 35% 10% 1%
13 FREEDMAN Janna N. 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 31%
14 SHEALY Maggie 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 13%
15 SATHYANATH Kailing 100% 98% 86% 57% 23% 4%
16 BLUM Leah I. 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 8%
17 STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 46%
18 KIM Catherine 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 29% 6%
19 OISHI Megumi 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 29%
20 SONG Jenny 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 15%
21 YAP Madeline 100% 99% 93% 74% 41% 13% 2%
22 HOFFMAN Ilsa L. 100% 100% 100% 98% 90% 65% 25%
23 CHEN Erica 100% 98% 86% 54% 19% 2%
24 MACE Eliza M. 100% 94% 69% 33% 8% 1%
25 BROWN Emma 100% 97% 81% 49% 18% 4% -
26 DRAGON Rainer 100% 100% 95% 78% 45% 15% 2%
27 GHOSH Priyanka 100% 93% 68% 34% 10% 1% -
28 VAN ATTA Grace Y. 100% 99% 90% 63% 26% 4%
29 TAO Hannah J. 100% 96% 78% 44% 14% 2%
30 PETTIT Sara M. 100% 85% 49% 16% 3% -
31 FEIGELES Carolyn A. 100% 88% 53% 19% 3% -
32 WALTER Zsofia R. 100% 99% 91% 66% 32% 8% 1%
33 SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. 100% 100% 99% 95% 75% 34%
34 YONG Erika E. 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 20% 3%
35 TANG Annie L. 100% 100% 96% 81% 51% 19% 3%
36 WEINBERG Alexandra L. 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 40% 8%
37 ROH Rachel E. 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 8%
38 SHVARTSMAN Rochelle 100% 95% 75% 41% 13% 2%
38 HAN Jeanette X. 100% 89% 56% 20% 3% -
40 PINCUS Emma Y. 100% 96% 78% 44% 15% 3% -
41 HILADO Sarah 100% 95% 73% 39% 12% 2%
42 HONE Katarina G. 100% 99% 93% 72% 38% 12% 1%
43 KYNETT Kathryn G. 100% 98% 87% 59% 25% 6% -
44 KOO Samantha 100% 99% 90% 66% 32% 9% 1%
45 LAMBERT Jasmine M. 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 33% 6%
46 STONE Hava S. 100% 99% 92% 71% 37% 11% 1%
47 KUZNETSOVA Nastassja 100% 98% 85% 56% 24% 5% -
48 KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) 100% 90% 58% 23% 5% 1% -
49 HE Charlotte 100% 99% 94% 76% 44% 14% 2%
50 BOIS Adele 100% 99% 93% 73% 40% 12% 2%
51 HULSEBURG Kaitlyn 100% 100% 95% 76% 42% 11%
52 KOBOZEVA Tamara V. 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 3%
53 CHERNOMORSKY Maria 100% 99% 89% 60% 24% 4%
54 KOBERSTEIN Maggie 100% 93% 67% 32% 8% 1%
55 BECCHINA Bridget F. 100% 97% 79% 46% 16% 2%
55 CASHMAN Natalie 100% 99% 91% 68% 33% 7%
57 EDWARDS Darby 100% 91% 61% 25% 6% -
58 LI Victoria J. 100% 95% 74% 40% 12% 2%
59 KATZ Anat 100% 97% 81% 48% 17% 3% -
60 ZIELINSKI Isabella G. 100% 94% 73% 39% 13% 2% -
61 BENOIT Adelaide L. 100% 92% 64% 28% 7% 1% -
61 CHAN Audrey 100% 99% 93% 73% 39% 12% 1%
63 CANNON Sophia E. 100% 96% 77% 44% 15% 3% -
64 TIBURCIO Diana 100% 99% 94% 73% 39% 12% 1%
65 BURCH Makana Y. 100% 92% 65% 29% 7% 1%
66 YURT Leyla 100% 78% 36% 9% 1% -
67 SHOMAN Miriam 100% 98% 85% 55% 23% 5% -
68 MANUBAG Amanda R. 100% 94% 70% 35% 10% 2% -
69 MILLER Mattea K. 100% 86% 51% 19% 4% - -
70 BAWA Sanya 100% 88% 56% 23% 6% 1% -
71 DANIELS Erica 100% 81% 44% 14% 3% - -
72 OXENSTIERNA Carolina 100% 93% 65% 27% 6% -
73 VALADEZ Emily T. 100% 82% 43% 12% 2% -
74 IYER Mohini R. 100% 81% 43% 14% 2% -
75 WANG Caroline Y. 100% 95% 72% 36% 10% 1%
76 BENTOLILA Yedida 100% 73% 33% 8% 1% - -
77 DEPEW Charlotte R. 100% 69% 27% 6% 1% - -
78 SPORN Melanie 100% 75% 34% 9% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.