Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
2 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
3 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
3 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
5 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
6 | KETKAR Ketki | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
7 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
8 | CHAN Cheri K. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
9 | TYLER Syd | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
10 | ROBLES Elena | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
11 | KETKAR Mallika | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
12 | WANG Nora | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
13 | LIN Katie Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
14 | AHUJA Arianna | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
15 | CHIN Isabella | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 42% | 13% | |
16 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
17 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% |
18 | GABERKORN Nadia | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
19 | WANG Elizabeth | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
20 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
21 | PATURU Meghana | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
21 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 21% |
23 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
24 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
25 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
26 | CHAN Elizabeth | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
27 | KIM Diane E. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
28 | SMUK Daria A. | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
28 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
30 | REID Anousheh | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 7% |
31 | MAO Amy | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
32 | SAAL Anna | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
33 | ORTEGA Ivanna S. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 57% |
34 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
35 | WU Amelia | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
36 | CHOI Eunice | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
37 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 3% |
38 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
38 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
40 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
41 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
42 | GU Sarah | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
43 | SMITH Grace L. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 4% |
44 | LEE Sumin | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 50% | 16% |
45 | PALANSKI Cate | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
46 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
47 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
48 | SEMIKIN Julia | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
49 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
50 | LEE Michelle | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
51 | LUO Ashley | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
52 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
53 | CALDERA Lexi I. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
54 | WANG Karen | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% |
55 | POPA Catherine | 8% | 39% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
56 | LAN Alice S. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
57 | MOSKOFF Tessa | - | 1% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 12% | |
58 | KHROL Caralina | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
59 | PARTE Isabella B. | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
60 | KIM Erika S. | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
61 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 3% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 6% | |
62 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
63 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
64 | LEE Yedda | 1% | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
65 | MCLANE Lauren | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
66 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 10% |
67 | MCCLAIN-YU Eri M. | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | < 1% |
68 | GANDHI Sedna S. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
69 | ZHANG Tina | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
70 | BURN Lauren M. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
71 | HUANG audrey | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | < 1% | - |
72 | MILEWSKI Nicole | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 3% |
73 | GITHENS Gracyn J. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
74 | DANIEL Olivia | - | 1% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
75 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
76 | JAMES Josephine | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
76 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 20% |
78 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
79 | ELLENT Isabella S. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
80 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
81 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
82 | LOWENSTEIN Penelope J. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
83 | DRONAMRAJU Navya | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
84 | GHIDINA O'Livia G. | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 29% |
85 | BECCHINA Olivia | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
85 | FELAND Alexandra | 1% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
87 | REMEZA Alissa | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
88 | LABRACHE Ella P. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
89 | YU Nicole J. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
90 | HUNTER Madison | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
91 | LU Samantha R. | 1% | 9% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
92 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
93 | TOLBA Salma | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
94 | DARANOUVONG Logan | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
94 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
96 | WEBER Nora | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
97 | WALBERT Charlotte B. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
98 | ZHU-HILL Alice A. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
99 | GLICK Nina | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
100 | PANT Anisha | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
101 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
102 | CHANG Ella | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
103 | LEE Kaitlyn S. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
104 | SINHA Zara | 10% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
105 | LONG Madeline M. | 9% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
106 | KOKES Ava | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
107 | MILLARD Lily C. | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
108 | PADHYE Tanishka | - | 4% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
109 | GOEDICKE Elway | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
110 | MING Cynthia | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
111 | TSANG JAFFE Avi | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
112 | GLASER Drew | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
113 | GAO Judy | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
114 | MIN MAGNOLIA | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
115 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
116 | ANDERSON Nora E. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
117 | KIM Zoe L. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 1% |
118 | RAZA Nadia A. | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
118 | DILLE Carolina G. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
120 | SCHMULTS Sophie W. | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
121 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
122 | HICKS Grace | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
123 | FLO Sena | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
124 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 4% |
125 | WITTE Vera | 4% | 32% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
126 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
126 | LI Charlotte | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
128 | ELSTON Sophia | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
129 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
130 | PALMER Amelia C. | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | |
131 | WATRALL Christina | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
132 | BUCUR Naomi | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
133 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
134 | PAN Michelle | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
135 | LI Alisha | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
135 | LI Michelle | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
137 | YAO KATHARINE | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
138 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
139 | SON Katherine (Injee) | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
140 | DUAN Jenny S. | 12% | 38% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
141 | ZENG Katrina | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
142 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
143 | KIZILBASH Zara | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
144 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 13% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
145 | MUELLER Emma M. | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
146 | BARRETT Elisabeth | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
147 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 3% |
148 | CHOI Grace | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
149 | HU Chelsea | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
150 | WEINSIER Ryan | 1% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
151 | LEE Rachel | 1% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
152 | JOSEPH mikayla | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
153 | MORAN Rhea | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
153 | HSU Adele Y. | 22% | 41% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
155 | KIM Jayna | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
156 | ZHENG Linden | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
157 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
158 | RAUSCH Juliana | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
159 | LIN Elaine | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
160 | XU Jessica | 10% | 60% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
161 | LEWIS Sophia | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
162 | MUN Brianna K. | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
162 | GREGORY Aleksandra | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
164 | YU Bailey | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
165 | DOWNARD Audrianna | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
166 | POPOVICI Alina B. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
166 | PEREZ Ariana | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
168 | YPHANTIDES Anthi | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
169 | MESCHIA Maggie | 2% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
169 | DU Angela | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
171 | JEAN Olympe G. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
172 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
173 | BOHRER Shira | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
174 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
174 | LO Sabrina S. | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - |
174 | FURST Chloe | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
177 | PECK Maia A. | - | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
178 | YIN Grace | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
179 | KNOEPFFLER ANDREA V. | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
180 | GOSHKO Audrey | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
181 | FRYDRYK Sydney K. | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
182 | BANKULLA Misha R. | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
183 | FRIEDLANDER Sarah | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
184 | CHEN Quanyou Lisa | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
185 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
186 | LI Vivian | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
187 | ZALEWSKI Rosalyn | 21% | 48% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
188 | SINGH Aayushi | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
189 | DREFKE Sigrid | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
189 | HABERMAN Hailey | 1% | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
191 | FARICY Aislynn A. | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
191 | WILLIAMS Sophia | 16% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
193 | PANDEY Aashna | 86% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
194 | ODOM Megan A. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
194 | NELSON Grace E. | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
196 | STOCK Olivia | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
197 | LEE Samantha X. | 17% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
198 | BROWN Hannah | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
200 | MACEY Hadley | 30% | 44% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
201 | YIM Rachael | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.