Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JING Emily | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 50% | 25% |
| 2 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 3 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 3 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 5 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 6 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 35% |
| 7 | JANG Kimberley | - | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 41% | |
| 8 | LAMBERT Mahala | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
| 9 | GUERRA Sofia E. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 43% |
| 9 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 11 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 12 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 13 | PANT Anisha | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 14 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
| 15 | BATRA Chaahat | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 16 | FU Qihan | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 17 | HAMZA Malak | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 18 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
| 18 | SU Alena J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
| 20 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 21 | TANG AI JIA | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 23 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 24 | AHMED Hannah | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 3% |
| 25 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
| 26 | LEE Bethanie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 27 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 28 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 29 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 48% | 23% | |
| 30 | SU Michelle | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 31 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 32 | VAUGHAN Norah | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | EYER Hailey M. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 34 | SENIC Adeline | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% | |
| 35 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
| 36 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 37 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 3% |
| 38 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 3% |
| 39 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 40 | WONG Sophia M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
| 41 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | - | - | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
| 42 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 43 | CANNON Lira J. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 44 | GOOR Viviene E. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 45 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 46 | ROY Layla | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 46 | KOKES Gwendolen | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 48 | CUI Amy | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | GU EMILY | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 50 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 51 | SHA Yi Ling | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 52 | UPTON Sydney | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 53 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 54 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 55 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
| 56 | LIN Victoria T. | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 57 | YEN Natalie | - | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
| 58 | NOVIKOV Allegra | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 59 | WANG Chloe | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 60 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | - |
| 61 | UMAP Arna | - | 8% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 62 | WU Celine | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 63 | RAO Sonia D. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 64 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 3% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 65 | HOANG Mai | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 66 | FURST Chloe | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 67 | MI Aileen | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 68 | ZHANG Eunice | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 69 | CHARALEL Jessica | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 70 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% |
| 71 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 72 | LEE Samantha X. | - | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 73 | TOM Caitlyn | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 74 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 75 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 76 | KOSLOW Amicie | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 5% |
| 77 | ZULUETA Catherine | 1% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 78 | WEI Vika | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 79 | WANG Jasmine | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 80 | LEE Allison | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 81 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 82 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 82 | LEE Fiona E. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 84 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 39% |
| 85 | COOPER Piper W. | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 86 | LAI Evelyn | - | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 87 | ZHENG Julie | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 88 | LIU Zhaoyi | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 89 | GAO Anna | 33% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | GONG Chloe | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 91 | ZHUANG Sophie | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 92 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 19% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | WELBORN Calissa | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 94 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 95 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 2% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 96 | CHEN Chloe I. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 97 | SHINKAREV Olga | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 98 | HAN Crystal | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% | |
| 99 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 100 | KIM Rachel | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 101 | LI Irina | 8% | 48% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 102 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 6% |
| 103 | BAWA Sahana | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 104 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | - | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 105 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 1% | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 106 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 107 | LUO Sandra J. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 108 | BHARATHI Maithreyi S. | 2% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 109 | GAMRADT Taylor | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 110 | POPOKH Aleksandra | 2% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 111 | OTEYZA Camille | 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 112 | LI Sophia M. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 113 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 114 | GOLLNICK Mira | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 115 | KAPUSTINA Arina | 1% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 116 | XU Audrey J. | 12% | 47% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 117 | LI Grace | 51% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 118 | SULTER Aurelie | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 119 | HAN Ashley | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 120 | PENG Charlotte | 2% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 121 | VO Bao-Vy | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 122 | SULLIVAN Emma | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 123 | MUSTETI-OPREA Isabella | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 124 | HOANG Anh | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 125 | YIM Rachael | 26% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 126 | NICKOLOV Nora | 27% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 127 | HOBSON Ava | 4% | 46% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 128 | MEYER Lily I. | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 129 | KIM April | 3% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 129 | SANTANGELO Aurora | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 131 | LEE Brielle | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 132 | MANN Sophia J. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 133 | WANG Celine S. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 134 | SUN Emily | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 135 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 136 | CHOW Annabelle | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 136 | TSANG Catherine | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 138 | ZHANG Zoe | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 139 | BEAVER Hannah | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 140 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 141 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 142 | BOLES Amanda X. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 143 | LEVY Avery | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 144 | THOMAS Saejel | 40% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 145 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 146 | NAIR Supriya | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 147 | ZHENG Zoe | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 148 | KIES Daniela | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 149 | JONES Jenna | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 150 | ZHOU Sophia | 16% | 42% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 151 | GUHA Maya | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 152 | SHUM Maya | 5% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 153 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 154 | ZHU Julia | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 155 | DUONG Zoey | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 155 | HO Kristen | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 157 | MASON-DARNELL Zoe | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 158 | CHOI Kailyn | 34% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 158 | PARK Alexandria | 55% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 160 | MAENG Victoria | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 160 | DATLA Meha | 78% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 160 | ZHU Elise | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 163 | BOWEN Teresa | 50% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.