Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | - | - | 8% | 40% | 52% |
| 2 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 14% |
| 3 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 49% |
| 3 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 5 | REID Anousheh | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 6 | REID Sobia | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 7 | GU Sarah | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 8 | CHO Claire E. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | JIN Jasmine | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 10 | LEE Michelle | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 12% |
| 11 | OGAWA Kaylin | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 12 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 49% | 18% |
| 13 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
| 14 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 15 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | DESAI Meera P. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 17 | MILEWSKI Nicole | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 18 | BENKLER Riley M. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 19 | TOLBA Salma | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | KOKES Ava | - | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 21 | CHAN Elizabeth | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 23 | GAO Judy | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 24 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | 7% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 25 | LU Samantha R. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 27 | BLIN Margaux J. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 28 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LONG Madeline M. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 31 | LEE Yedda | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 32 | YU Bailey | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | MING Cynthia | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | KONG Carina | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | RICHARDSON Lauren C. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | HU Chelsea | 16% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | FLO Sena | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 38 | DREFKE Sigrid | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | KIM Angelina | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | MACEDON Gianna | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | LIU Nicole | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.