Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
2 | SHEARER Natalie E. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
3 | KER Grace | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 8% |
3 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
5 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
6 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
7 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
8 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
9 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
9 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
11 | MIKA Veronica | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 19% | |
12 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 2% |
13 | NATHANSON Samantha E. | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 44% | 20% | |
14 | MAREK SOFIA | - | - | 3% | 21% | 50% | 27% | |
15 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
16 | YEN Natalie | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
17 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
18 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
19 | HUNG Anna | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
20 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% |
21 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 20% |
22 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
23 | KONG Carys H. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% |
24 | DUCKETT Madison | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
25 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 5% | 27% | 44% | 23% | |
26 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
27 | OBRADOVIC Ana | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
28 | HILD Nisha | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
29 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
30 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 36% | 5% |
31 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
32 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
33 | GHAYALOD reya | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
34 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
35 | SHI Cathleen | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
36 | LEE Sophia | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
37 | WANG Zidan | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
38 | YANG Angelina | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
39 | FANG Victoria W. | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 40% | 14% | |
40 | ADEBANKE Niara | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
41 | LU Elaine | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 19% | 2% | |
42 | KIM Marley I. | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
43 | WHALEN Paige C. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
44 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
45 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
46 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 9% |
47 | PASHIN Anna | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
48 | XU Emily T. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
48 | YUAN Greta | - | 4% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
50 | TSE Angelina | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 37% | |
51 | PROCACCINI Ashten V. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
52 | LEE Hannah | 2% | 13% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
53 | GOMES Diana C. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
54 | LUKER Sophia | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
55 | HE Lizbeth | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
56 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
57 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
58 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
59 | WEI Vivian W. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
59 | JAVERI Amaya | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
61 | BURCH Keona Y. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
62 | FALL-LAKATOS Jane | 5% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 3% | - | |
63 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 4% | 25% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | |
64 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
65 | HELLER Mikenna E. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
66 | NG Sarah W. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
67 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
68 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
69 | HUANG Caroline | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
70 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
71 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
72 | JOHNSON Lydia | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
73 | JUNG Irene | 17% | 45% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
74 | ZHAO Emily W. | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
75 | HENRY Soraya S. | 5% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
76 | SO Catelyn | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 12% |
77 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
78 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
79 | MESSICK Maya | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
80 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
81 | TSOI Julie | 10% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
82 | DENG Brooke | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
83 | FAN Grace | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
84 | YAN Lena | 15% | 42% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
85 | DIECK Miranda P. | 4% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
86 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 13% | 44% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
87 | LIN Lauren | 41% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
88 | EVANS Madelynn | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
89 | YANG Lea | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
90 | NAYAK Indra | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
91 | REGANTI Sitara | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
92 | NAYAK Anika | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
93 | WILMORE Claire | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
94 | PYO Penelope E. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
94 | FLETCHER Belen | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
96 | KATILA-MIIKKULAINEN Alli | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
97 | SCOTT Eve | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
98 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 17% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
98 | LIN Sophia | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
100 | WUNNAVA Elina | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | - |
101 | LIU Sydney | 10% | 30% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
102 | CHAN Jolene | 9% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
103 | BARRIE Sadie Q. | 38% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
104 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 21% | 50% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
105 | YAM Danika | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
105 | NAYAK Esha | 34% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
107 | GRULICH Rayaana | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
107 | COLBY Mercer | 34% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
109 | CARRASCO Elle | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
109 | LITTLE Avery | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
109 | TREACY Aisling | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
112 | JEONG Katie | < 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
113 | WANG Olivia | 3% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
114 | DWYER Ciara E. | 21% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
115 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
116 | BROOKS Chloe | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.