Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
| 2 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
| 3 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
| 3 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% |
| 5 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 6 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 7 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 8 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 9 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 16% |
| 9 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 11 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% | |
| 12 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | 2% |
| 13 | NATHANSON Samantha E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 20% | |
| 14 | MAREK SOFIA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 27% | |
| 15 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% |
| 16 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 92% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 18 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 19 | HUNG Anna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
| 21 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 22 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 23 | KONG Carys H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 24 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 25 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% | |
| 26 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 27 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 28 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
| 29 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 30 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 5% |
| 31 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 32 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 33 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 34 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 35 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 36 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
| 37 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 38 | YANG Angelina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 39 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 14% | |
| 40 | ADEBANKE Niara | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 21% | 2% | |
| 42 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 43 | WHALEN Paige C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | - |
| 44 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 45 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 46 | FERREIRA Alejandra E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 9% |
| 47 | PASHIN Anna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 48 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 50 | TSE Angelina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% | |
| 51 | PROCACCINI Ashten V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
| 52 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 53 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 54 | LUKER Sophia | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
| 56 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 57 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
| 58 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 59 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | 1% |
| 59 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 61 | BURCH Keona Y. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 62 | FALL-LAKATOS Jane | 100% | 95% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 63 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 64 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 65 | HELLER Mikenna E. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 66 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 67 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 69 | HUANG Caroline | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 70 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 71 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% |
| 72 | JOHNSON Lydia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 73 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 83% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 74 | ZHAO Emily W. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 75 | HENRY Soraya S. | 100% | 95% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 76 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 12% |
| 77 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 78 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 79 | MESSICK Maya | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 81 | TSOI Julie | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 82 | DENG Brooke | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 83 | FAN Grace | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 84 | YAN Lena | 100% | 85% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 85 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 96% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 86 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 87% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 87 | LIN Lauren | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 88 | EVANS Madelynn | 100% | 94% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 89 | YANG Lea | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 90 | NAYAK Indra | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 91 | REGANTI Sitara | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 93 | WILMORE Claire | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 94 | PYO Penelope E. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 94 | FLETCHER Belen | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 96 | KATILA-MIIKKULAINEN Alli | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 97 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 83% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 98 | LIN Sophia | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 100 | WUNNAVA Elina | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 101 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 102 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 103 | BARRIE Sadie Q. | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 104 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 79% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
| 105 | YAM Danika | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 105 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 107 | GRULICH Rayaana | 100% | 75% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 107 | COLBY Mercer | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | CARRASCO Elle | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 109 | LITTLE Avery | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 109 | TREACY Aisling | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 112 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 113 | WANG Olivia | 100% | 97% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 114 | DWYER Ciara E. | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 115 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 116 | BROOKS Chloe | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.