Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOLZ Daniel | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 2 | DUCKETT Myles | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
| 3 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 3 | BERA Enzo | - | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 42% | |
| 5 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | - | - | 7% | 35% | 58% | |
| 6 | HU Christopher | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 7 | SU Landon | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 27% |
| 8 | ANAND Rohan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 9 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 10 | LEE Noah | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 5% |
| 11 | CHEN Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 50% | 15% |
| 12 | CLARK Gabriel | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
| 13 | OSENAR Sam | 16% | 45% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 14 | SHINCHUK Daniel | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 15 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% |
| 16 | ERMAKOV Semeon | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
| 17 | TAO Jeffrey | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 51% | 32% |
| 18 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 49% | 25% | |
| 19 | ALLARDYCE Lachlan | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
| 20 | JOO Jeein | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | YERRAMILLI Tejas | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 22 | SHANKWILER Christopher | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
| 23 | KERCHER Alexander | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 24 | KALPATHY Rohit | 24% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | COLLAS Raphael | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
| 26 | PI Alexander | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | YANG Dylan | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 28 | MEHAN Nicholas | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
| 29 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 13% | 1% |
| 29 | SIDDIQUI Shayan | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | GRIGORESCU Alexander | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 33% |
| 32 | ANDRES Michael | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 33 | HILL Spencer | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 34 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 35 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | CHEN Lohen | 1% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | RAMANAN Govind | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | TSAO Oliver | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 39 | SUGIURA Samuel | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 40 | HRISTOV Kris | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | CHOW William T. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 42 | PATEL Rayn | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | LIN Philip T. | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
| 44 | KONG Alan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
| 45 | KUSHNIR Zack | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 46 | SAKMANN Sebastian | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 47 | YAN William | - | 3% | 22% | 45% | 27% | 3% | |
| 48 | TRAN Dash | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 40% | 7% | |
| 49 | ROZMUS Marek | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 50 | BONETTI Brayden | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 51 | GONG Jerry | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | JIANG Jeremy | 2% | 10% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 53 | ANAND Rishab | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | VAID Luke | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 55 | GERSTMANN Max T. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 56 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% | |
| 57 | KLETTER Max | 1% | 12% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 58 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 59 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 60 | SKIMEL Michael | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 60 | PRIMUS Nazir | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 62 | CHANG Yuyang | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | ALAVE Kyle | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 64 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | HOLZ Lucas | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 66 | OH Aster | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
| 67 | WANG Max | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 68 | KIM Samuel | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 68 | NAYAK Surin K. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 70 | DANIEL Andrew | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 71 | GUYDOUK Alexey | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 72 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 73 | IDRISSI Idris | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | |
| 74 | SHU Tony | 1% | 12% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
| 75 | TONG Ryan | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 76 | ALLARDYCE Graham | 3% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 7% | - | |
| 77 | KURILO Michael | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 78 | CLARK Caleb | 8% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 79 | SMITH Christopher | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 80 | GUAN Dennis | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 81 | BRANDT Jaden | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 82 | CHAN Henry | 43% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 83 | LIU Aaron | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 84 | KIM Ethan | 1% | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 85 | JORGESON Charlie | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 86 | XU Ivan | 49% | 45% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 87 | BESSELMAN Noah | 49% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 88 | CIACCIA Luca | 27% | 49% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 89 | HUNG Samuel | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 90 | WANG Zhuoyi | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | BOHRER Ari | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | HAPP Braeden | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 93 | LIU Vince | 6% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 94 | SAMMI Mukul | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | LEE Andrew | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 96 | LEE Thomas | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | PARKILA Lukas | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 98 | HALL Noah | 2% | 17% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 99 | URSU Marcel T. | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 100 | WITCZAK Mateus | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 101 | HO Anson | 25% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 102 | ZHAO Zihan | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 103 | SMITH Jacob | 21% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 105 | JUNG Ethan | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 106 | CHYCZEWSKI Maximilian | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 108 | LOO Jason | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.