Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 2 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 3 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% |
| 3 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
| 5 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 46% | 12% |
| 6 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 7 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 8 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 9 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
| 10 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 11 | LIU Zhaoyi | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | |
| 12 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% |
| 13 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 14 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 15 | KAPUSTINA Arina | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | NAIR Supriya | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 18 | HAN Crystal | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 19 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 17% |
| 20 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 21 | HERGAN Anastasia K. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 22% |
| 22 | WANG Jasmine | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 23 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 38% | 12% |
| 24 | LI Sophia M. | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 24 | HAN Ashley | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 26 | VO Bao-Vy | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | BIODROWICZ Julia | - | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 28 | STRUGAR Steliana | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | HOANG Anh | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 30 | POPOKH Aleksandra | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 31 | SHUM Maya | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | CHOW Annabelle | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 33 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
| 34 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 2% |
| 35 | SEAL Cameron I. | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 30% |
| 36 | MI Aileen | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 37 | MANN Sophia J. | - | 9% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 38 | MARISI Gianna | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 39 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 40 | SINGH Ashni | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 41 | CROMWELL Keira | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 43 | ZHANG Eunice | 2% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 44 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% |
| 45 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | PARK Alexandria | 15% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 49 | DAVIS Cate | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 50 | SUN Emily | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 51 | CHI Chelsea | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | BOLES Amanda X. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 53 | SHIM Grace | 14% | 47% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | SUN Chloe | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 55 | SWOPE Farren | - | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
| 56 | YANG Iris | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 57 | MORALES Paulina | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | XU Audrey J. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 59 | ZHOU Sophia | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | LIU Emma | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 61 | HSU Kaylin | 1% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 62 | ZHENG Zoe | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 63 | GUO Lily | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 64 | KAZA Nitya V. | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 65 | KIM Rachel | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 66 | ZHANG Zoe | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 67 | MU Allison | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 68 | CHOW Tessa | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 69 | HUESER Nisha | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 69 | PENG Charlotte | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 71 | OH Julia | 4% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 72 | CHANG Natalie | 26% | 46% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 73 | LEE Ella | 57% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 74 | KULKARNI Sara | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | BADLANI Diya | 4% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 76 | BEAVER Ava | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
| 77 | LEE Roselyn | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | MAENG Victoria | 40% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 79 | AIRES Julia | 11% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 80 | WILLIAMSON Reece | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 81 | WANG Jolie Z. | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | PAULUS Sloane | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 83 | ALLEYNE Taylar | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 84 | CHEN Thea | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 85 | SEAL Ayda | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 85 | QUINTERO Camila | < 1% | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 87 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | JONES Maya | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 5% | |
| 90 | SAMI Amna | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 91 | SONG Juliette | 64% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 92 | GUHA Asha | 8% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 93 | WRIGHT Trinity | < 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 94 | WRIGHT Taliyah | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.