Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
2 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
3 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
3 | FEDELI Caterina S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
5 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 12% |
6 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
7 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
8 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
9 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
10 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | |
11 | LIU Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% | |
12 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 18% |
13 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
14 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
15 | KAPUSTINA Arina | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
16 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
17 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
18 | HAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
19 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 17% |
20 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
21 | HERGAN Anastasia K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
22 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
23 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% | 12% |
24 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
24 | HAN Ashley | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
26 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
27 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
28 | STRUGAR Steliana | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
29 | HOANG Anh | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
30 | POPOKH Aleksandra | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | |
31 | SHUM Maya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
32 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
33 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 16% | |
34 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 25% | 2% |
35 | SEAL Cameron I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% |
36 | MI Aileen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
37 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
38 | MARISI Gianna | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
39 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% | - |
40 | SINGH Ashni | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - |
41 | CROMWELL Keira | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
42 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
43 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
44 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
45 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
46 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
47 | PARK Alexandria | 100% | 85% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
48 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
49 | DAVIS Cate | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% | - |
50 | SUN Emily | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
51 | CHI Chelsea | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
52 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 3% |
53 | SHIM Grace | 100% | 86% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
54 | SUN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
55 | SWOPE Farren | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
56 | YANG Iris | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
57 | MORALES Paulina | 100% | 79% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
58 | XU Audrey J. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
59 | ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
60 | LIU Emma | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
61 | HSU Kaylin | 100% | 99% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
62 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
63 | GUO Lily | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
64 | KAZA Nitya V. | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
65 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
66 | ZHANG Zoe | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
67 | MU Allison | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
68 | CHOW Tessa | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
69 | HUESER Nisha | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
69 | PENG Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
71 | OH Julia | 100% | 96% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | |
72 | CHANG Natalie | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
73 | LEE Ella | 100% | 43% | 7% | - | - | - | |
74 | KULKARNI Sara | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
75 | BADLANI Diya | 100% | 96% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
76 | BEAVER Ava | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
77 | LEE Roselyn | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
78 | MAENG Victoria | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
79 | AIRES Julia | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
80 | WILLIAMSON Reece | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
81 | WANG Jolie Z. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
82 | PAULUS Sloane | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
83 | ALLEYNE Taylar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
84 | CHEN Thea | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
85 | SEAL Ayda | 100% | 71% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
85 | QUINTERO Camila | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
87 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
88 | JONES Maya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
90 | SAMI Amna | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
91 | SONG Juliette | 100% | 36% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
92 | GUHA Asha | 100% | 92% | 67% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
93 | WRIGHT Trinity | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
94 | WRIGHT Taliyah | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 7% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.