Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 2 | OLSEN Natalie J. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 3 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 68% |
| 3 | JULIEN Michelle | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 11% | |
| 5 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | - | 5% | 31% | 46% | 17% | |
| 6 | LIAO Siwen | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 7 | ATLURI Sara V. | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 8 | SHI Cathleen | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 9 | JOHNSON Lauren | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
| 10 | OBRADOVIC Ana | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 11 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 12 | RIZKALA Joanna | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 13 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% | |
| 14 | MA Grace C. | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 15 | SINHA Anika | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% | |
| 16 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 17 | WEI Vivian W. | 2% | 16% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 18 | MIKA Veronica | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 40% | 8% | |
| 19 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% | |
| 20 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 21 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 44% | 10% |
| 22 | PROCACCINI Ashten V. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 23 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 1% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
| 24 | GRINBERG Aliya | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 25 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
| 26 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 6% | 41% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | TODD Phoebe | 14% | 42% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | YUAN Greta | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | LU Amy | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 30 | REN Xinling | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | BAKER Amelia M. | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 32 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | YUN Emma | 34% | 46% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 34 | NORRIS Kiera E. | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% | 1% |
| 36 | LEE Sophia | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 37 | JENKINS Scotland | 4% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | WANG Jianning | 25% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 7% | 59% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.