Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | D V V V D | V V V V V | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 2 | OLSEN Natalie J. | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | SHOMAN Jenna | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | JULIEN Michelle | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 5 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 6 | LIAO Siwen | D D D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 7 | ATLURI Sara V. | D V D V D | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 8 | SHI Cathleen | V D D D V | V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 9 | JOHNSON Lauren | V V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 10 | OBRADOVIC Ana | D D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 11 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 12 | RIZKALA Joanna | D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 13 | SHOMAN Miriam | V D V V D | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 14 | MA Grace C. | D V D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 15 | SINHA Anika | D V V D D | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 16 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | V D D D D D | V V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 17 | WEI Vivian W. | V V V V V D | D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 18 | MIKA Veronica | V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | NEWELL Alexia C. | V D V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 20 | TAO Hannah J. | V D V D V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 21 | BAKER Audrey C. | D V V V D V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 22 | PROCACCINI Ashten V. | V V V V D D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 23 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 24 | GRINBERG Aliya | V D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 25 | GORMAN Victoria M. | V V V D D D | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 26 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | D D V D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 27 | TODD Phoebe | D V V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 28 | YUAN Greta | D D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 29 | LU Amy | V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 30 | REN Xinling | D D D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 31 | BAKER Amelia M. | D D V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 32 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | D D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 33 | YUN Emma | D D D V V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 34 | NORRIS Kiera E. | D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 35 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | D V D D V D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 36 | LEE Sophia | V D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 37 | JENKINS Scotland | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 38 | WANG Jianning | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 39 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.