Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHOI Hyunseok | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 2 | DENNER Lysander H. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 3 | JOHNSON Langston C. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 3 | WIND Nicky E. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 5 | SAKHAMURI Surya | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 6 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 7 | SHI Andrew | - | - | 1% | 8% | 41% | 44% | 7% |
| 8 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | JOHNSTON Bennett S. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 10 | GINIS Nathan | - | - | 4% | 26% | 45% | 24% | |
| 11 | MORRILL William | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 29% | 4% | |
| 12 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 5% |
| 13 | MORRILL Justin | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | 13% | 41% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | YANG Richard | 9% | 40% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | HUANG Ethan F. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | - |
| 17 | MATSUI Alen | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 36% | 7% |
| 18 | DENNER Maximilian P. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 19 | ZHOU Kevin | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 20 | KIM Jeremy Y. | - | 2% | 22% | 49% | 25% | 3% | |
| 21 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% | |
| 22 | KIM Shaun M. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 23 | FENG Leo | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 25 | CHON Taylor A. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | WILSON Jude | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 45% | 40% |
| 27 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 41% | 10% |
| 28 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 29 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 30 | SHOMAN Noah | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LU Caleb Q. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | COX Luis E. | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | FLOT Tai A. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 34 | CHIN Matthew W. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | OWENS Harrison J. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | - | 5% | 27% | 45% | 22% | |
| 37 | GILSON Lucas B. | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 11% | |
| 38 | MADDALONE Thomas | 1% | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 39 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 40 | WANG Robert | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SHERWOOD Hayden F. | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | LEE Justin | 13% | 43% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | TURCK Caspar J. | 1% | 12% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 44 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 45 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 45 | ZHENG Edward L. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 47 | WANG Andrew | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | BLECKNER Noah | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 49 | GALLAGHER Brett | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | FORT David | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | WOODWARD Connor | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 52 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 54 | LEE Derek J. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 55 | HOLDEN Joseph | 8% | 33% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | MALONE Gregory D. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 57 | MIDLA Joshua D. | 18% | 47% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 58 | LEE Aydan J. | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | CARTAGENA Caden A. | 27% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 60 | YEE Evan J. | 32% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | LARRAZOLO Vincent | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.