Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHOI Hyunseok | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
2 | DENNER Lysander H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% |
3 | JOHNSON Langston C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
3 | WIND Nicky E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
5 | SAKHAMURI Surya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
6 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
7 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 51% | 7% |
8 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
9 | JOHNSTON Bennett S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
10 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% | |
11 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 4% | |
12 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 5% |
13 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
14 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | 100% | 87% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | |
15 | YANG Richard | 100% | 91% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
16 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
17 | MATSUI Alen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 7% |
18 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 8% |
19 | ZHOU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
20 | KIM Jeremy Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 28% | 3% | |
21 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% | |
22 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
23 | FENG Leo | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
24 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
25 | CHON Taylor A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
26 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 40% |
27 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 10% |
28 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
29 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
30 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
31 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
32 | COX Luis E. | 100% | 57% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
33 | FLOT Tai A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
34 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
35 | OWENS Harrison J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
36 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% | |
37 | GILSON Lucas B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 11% | |
38 | MADDALONE Thomas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
39 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
40 | WANG Robert | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
41 | SHERWOOD Hayden F. | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
42 | LEE Justin | 100% | 87% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
43 | TURCK Caspar J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
44 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
45 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
45 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
47 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | BLECKNER Noah | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
49 | GALLAGHER Brett | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
50 | FORT David | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
51 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
52 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
54 | LEE Derek J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
55 | HOLDEN Joseph | 100% | 92% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
56 | MALONE Gregory D. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
57 | MIDLA Joshua D. | 100% | 82% | 35% | 5% | - | - | |
58 | LEE Aydan J. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
59 | CARTAGENA Caden A. | 100% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
60 | YEE Evan J. | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
61 | LARRAZOLO Vincent | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.