Torrance, CA - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WANG Eric Y. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
2 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 44% | 48% |
3 | YOO Joshua H. | 3% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
3 | YUN Jaesun | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
5 | LICHT Aaron H. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 4% |
6 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
7 | LEE Conner M. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% |
8 | CHAN Aidan | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
9 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% |
10 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
11 | PATIL Aaryan A. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
12 | RHEE Ethan N. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 2% |
13 | TANN Justin | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
14 | LO Konnor | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 5% |
15 | STONE Esmond A. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
16 | GUO Ethan | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
17 | LIU Christopher X. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 49% | 25% |
18 | BOTYANSZKI Balint | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
19 | HAO Anwen | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
20 | LINDSEY Aiden | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | - |
21 | LEE Christopher M. | - | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
22 | TIEU Ethan | 2% | 13% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
23 | ARROYO Santiago | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
24 | QIU Nathan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
25 | SHERES Asher | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
26 | JONES Daniel | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
27 | LO Andrew T. | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
28 | ROBLEDO Everett M. | 7% | 31% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
29 | LIRA Daine C. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
30 | VO Minh Q. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
31 | CENTENO Zachary | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
32 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
33 | HARRIS Max A. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
34 | MANOHARA Rajath | 13% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
35 | ZHAO Aaron | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
36 | WILLIAMS Rhiley | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
37 | KUMAR Sachit | 27% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
38 | YE Anthony | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
38 | SHAO Yue | 9% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
40 | REAGAN Matthew | 66% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
40 | GUERRERO Julian | 30% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
42 | LINDSEY Kai | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.