Torrance, CA - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WANG Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
2 | ZUBATIY Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 48% |
3 | YOO Joshua H. | 100% | 97% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
3 | YUN Jaesun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
5 | LICHT Aaron H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 4% |
6 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
7 | LEE Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% |
8 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
9 | AVAKIAN Alec | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 20% |
10 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% |
11 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
12 | RHEE Ethan N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 2% |
13 | TANN Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
14 | LO Konnor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 5% |
15 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
16 | GUO Ethan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
17 | LIU Christopher X. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 25% |
18 | BOTYANSZKI Balint | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
19 | HAO Anwen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
20 | LINDSEY Aiden | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | - |
21 | LEE Christopher M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
22 | TIEU Ethan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - |
23 | ARROYO Santiago | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
24 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
25 | SHERES Asher | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
26 | JONES Daniel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
27 | LO Andrew T. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
28 | ROBLEDO Everett M. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
29 | LIRA Daine C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
30 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
31 | CENTENO Zachary | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
32 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 88% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
33 | HARRIS Max A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
34 | MANOHARA Rajath | 100% | 87% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
35 | ZHAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
36 | WILLIAMS Rhiley | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
37 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 73% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
38 | YE Anthony | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
38 | SHAO Yue | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
40 | REAGAN Matthew | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
40 | GUERRERO Julian | 100% | 70% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
42 | LINDSEY Kai | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.