Pasadena, CA - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
2 | LEE Sumin | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
3 | WANG Nora | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 9% |
3 | LEUNG Natalie | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% | |
5 | ZHANG mickey | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
6 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
7 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
8 | DANIEL Olivia | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
9 | GALLON Maya S. | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
10 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
11 | SON Katherine (Injee) | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
12 | YPHANTIDES Anthi | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
13 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
14 | CHOI Eunice | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | |
15 | LABRACHE Ella P. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
16 | PECK Maia A. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
17 | QURESHI Nisa | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
18 | BRYANT Michelle | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
19 | LO Sabrina S. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
20 | LEE Natasha | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
21 | KIM Annabelle | 28% | 45% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
22 | GULLY Wren | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
23 | KIM Jayna | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
24 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
25 | RODARTE Angelina | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
26 | SOOHOO Claire | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
27 | ERDOGAN necla | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.