Pasadena, CA - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAEK Alex J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | |
| 2 | KELLY William J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 3 | PARK Luke J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 3 | KO Brian J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 14% | |
| 5 | WESTELIUS Isak R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 6 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 7 | LEVY Jacob M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 8 | CATLIN Adam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | |
| 10 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 12% | |
| 11 | CHIN Jason Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 12 | SHERMAN Marco J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 13% | |
| 13 | WONG Anthony M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% |
| 14 | HO Justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 15 | KIM Brandon J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | OTAKE Jared K. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 19 | DIVITO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 55% | |
| 20 | MORAIS Paulo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | |
| 21 | CHAN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 3% | |
| 22 | MION Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 23 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | LUNA Emilio | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 25 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | NGUYEN Jett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | |
| 27 | FORTNER Lance R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
| 28 | HODESS Ethan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 13% | 1% | |
| 29 | WHARTON Zachary | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
| 31 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | MOHAMMAD Abdulwahab | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 34 | KIM Isaiah G. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 39% | 8% | - | |
| 35 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
| 36 | NGUYEN Nish | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 37 | SOOD Kishan S. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 38 | MAO Connor | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 1% | |
| 39 | SWEENEY Quinn | 100% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | LOMBARDI Leo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 41 | KIM BANSEOK | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 78% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 44 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 46 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 46 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | CHEN Wilson | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 49 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 50 | HONG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
| 51 | SANTOS FINK Sage A. | 100% | 78% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | STIAGUN Nikita | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 53 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | LAM Landon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
| 55 | SELIVANOV Adam | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 57 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | 2% | |
| 58 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 59 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 60 | AVRON Case B. | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | SCHENCK Theo | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 62 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 63 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 78% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 64 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 96% | 60% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 65 | MURA Andre Erix | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 67 | ECKER Liam | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | LEE David Y. | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 70 | NAM Michael | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 70 | MA Jonas(zhao long) | 100% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.