Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
2 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
3 | UPTON Elizabeth | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
3 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | - | - | 2% | 19% | 59% | 20% | |
5 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
6 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 57% | |
7 | ZHANG Alina C. | 1% | 11% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
8 | YE Eileen | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 3% |
9 | CHEN Jia P. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 43% | 9% | |
10 | MICHAELSEN Emily | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
11 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% | |
12 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
13 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
14 | LI Rachel Y. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
15 | SENIC Adeline | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
16 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
17 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 44% | 18% |
18 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
19 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
20 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% | |
21 | WEI Vika | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - | |
22 | LONG Madeline M. | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
23 | ABD-ELMONIEM Nusayba K. | 5% | 36% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
24 | KONG Carina | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
25 | RASO Olivia | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - | |
26 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
27 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | |
28 | NORTH Zoe M. | 3% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 4% | - | |
29 | CHEN Lefu | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
30 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
31 | CHARALEL Jessica | 5% | 28% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
32 | FU Qihan | 3% | 23% | 44% | 27% | 3% | - | |
33 | CHO Claire E. | 21% | 45% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
34 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
35 | SULTANA-HOLE Olivia B. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
36 | VAUGHAN Norah | - | 10% | 37% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
37 | SMITH Emilee E. | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
38 | LEE Kaitlyn | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
39 | WANG Yudi | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
40 | SCHATZ Erika J. | 19% | 48% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | HSIEH Rebecca | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
42 | COOPER Piper W. | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
43 | GUAN Grace | 49% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
44 | HSIEH Sabrina | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
45 | QIAN Zhiyan | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.