San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEVY Jacob M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 40% | 28% |
2 | SHIH Benjamin | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
3 | SOHN Christopher | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
3 | KIM Isaiah G. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
5 | LI Raphael C. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
6 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
6 | SHERMAN Marco J. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
8 | URODOVSKIKH Evan | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
9 | CHUNG Jinwoo | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
10 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
11 | LOMBARDI Leo | 1% | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
12 | LAO Scott E. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
13 | MAO Connor | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
14 | SPEVAK Alexander | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
15 | ZHENG Alan H. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
16 | HODESS Ethan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
17 | CARTER Lucas M. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
18 | OH Samuel H. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
19 | CHOI Ethan L. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 39% | 6% |
20 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
21 | WESTELIUS Isak R. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
22 | KO Tyler B. | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
22 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 1% |
24 | AVRON Case B. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
25 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 44% | 14% |
26 | LAI Christopher W. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
27 | LUNA Emilio | 5% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
28 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
29 | MURATA Akitoshi D. | 49% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
30 | HUANG Bernard | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
31 | ZHANG Luke T. | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
32 | VILLASENOR Aidan | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
33 | SELIVANOV Adam | 9% | 40% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
34 | SOMERS Sean | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
35 | HSIUNG Richie | 2% | 18% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
36 | SOOD Kishan S. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
37 | HALL Harper | - | 7% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
38 | PATINO Yahir | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
39 | MU Jeffrey | 27% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
40 | SWEENEY Quinn | 20% | 48% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
42 | COTHRAN Jack | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.