Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HODGES Carter F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 2 | LIU Niles J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | |
| 3 | OURSLER Jack | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 6% | |
| 3 | MCGILLION-MOORE Jake | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 5 | PRILUTSKY David B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 5% |
| 6 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 7 | JANG Jaewon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% | |
| 8 | DING Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 9 | GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 10 | YANG Adam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 11 | ANCONA Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% |
| 12 | LEE Daniel C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
| 13 | GEE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 13% | |
| 14 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | 100% | 98% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
| 16 | SELENDY Maximilian (Max) A. | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | HU Oliver W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 18 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 19 | YU Vinni | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | 24% | 3% | |
| 20 | BATRAK Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 21 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 22 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | TRAUGOT Braden (Brady) C. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 24 | MA Alexander | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 25 | REALS Alden D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% | |
| 26 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 16% |
| 27 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 9% |
| 28 | REGE Advaith | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 29 | LIAO Alex J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 11% | |
| 30 | TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | BOVA Andrew | 100% | 96% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | IVARSSON Oliver | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 33 | WEINKOPF William O. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 34 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 36 | CAI Oliver K. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 4% | |
| 38 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% | |
| 39 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 42 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | |
| 43 | HO Ryan J. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 44 | DALBERG Leif | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | MACRAE Harrison A. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 46 | BRYANT Max | 100% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | YU Dale | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 49 | GORDON Sasha | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | SCHKODA Jeremy | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | CUTOLO Connor | 100% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | SWADDIPONG Diego P. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | QI Steve | 100% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | WANG Alex L. | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | POIROT Max | 100% | 78% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 57 | HASSETT Thomas | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.