Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | LARGAESPADA Fatima | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 2 | HONE Katarina G. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
| 3 | WOLFSON Elizabeth | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 3 | BUSTAMANTE Evie I. | 2% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 7% | |
| 5 | CHERNOMORSKY Alexandra E. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% |
| 6 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
| 7 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 8 | SHOMAN Miriam | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | PETTIT Sara M. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 11 | KUZNETSOVA Nastassja | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 12 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 2% |
| 13 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 2% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | GRODY Emmie | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | HUA Catherine W. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 16 | OWENS Celine A. | 1% | 10% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | DESAI Maya D. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 18 | RHIE Lena | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
| 19 | PRAXL Alexa R. | 21% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | SAKPAL Raghavi | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
| 22 | DIEF Menna | 1% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | NORMAN Lillia M. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 24 | ARNIPALLI Hamsika | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 25 | FISHER Nicole C. | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 26 | ATLURI Sara V. | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | KSHIRSAGAR Prachi | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
| 28 | OSTROWSKI Isabel | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 30 | GLUCK Ariel | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 31 | GLUCK Myriam | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | MARENTES Blanca E. | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 33 | DANIELS Erica | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 34 | KOWALSKI Celina | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | MASTERS Lara A. | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 36 | WEBB Maud | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.