Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | LARGAESPADA Fatima | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 2 | HONE Katarina G. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 3 | WOLFSON Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 3 | BUSTAMANTE Evie I. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 7% | |
| 5 | CHERNOMORSKY Alexandra E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 6 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% |
| 7 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 8 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 9 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | PETTIT Sara M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 11 | KUZNETSOVA Nastassja | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 12 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 22% | 2% |
| 13 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 14 | GRODY Emmie | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | HUA Catherine W. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 16 | OWENS Celine A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% |
| 17 | DESAI Maya D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 18 | RHIE Lena | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 19 | PRAXL Alexa R. | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 20 | SAKPAL Raghavi | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 22 | DIEF Menna | 100% | 99% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | NORMAN Lillia M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
| 24 | ARNIPALLI Hamsika | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 25 | FISHER Nicole C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 26 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | KSHIRSAGAR Prachi | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 28 | OSTROWSKI Isabel | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 29 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 30 | GLUCK Ariel | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 31 | GLUCK Myriam | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | MARENTES Blanca E. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 33 | DANIELS Erica | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
| 34 | KOWALSKI Celina | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | MASTERS Lara A. | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 36 | WEBB Maud | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.