Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FOX Viveka R. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
2 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% | |
3 | VASHISHT Suparna | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 6% | |
3 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
5 | FAGAN Margaret | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 64% |
6 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 6% | 22% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
7 | BOTELHO Lynn A. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
8 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
9 | VINES Kristin A. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
10 | KERR Margaret E. | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 8% | |
11 | BROWN Rachel (Rachel Brown) F. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
12 | CHAYKINA Natalie V. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
13 | MAHAR-PIERSMA Colleen | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
14 | TRELOAR Allison F. | 1% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
15 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
16 | MAUL Judy L. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
17 | MORRISON Monica L. | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | - |
18 | KNUTSON Theresa S. | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 5% | |
19 | LYTLE Darby A. | 4% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
20 | TASKER Monisha B. | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
21 | HALL Myra C. | 3% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
22 | CRUMBLISS Jennifer | 1% | 16% | 42% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
23 | LAMBERT Lisa L. | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
24 | SMITH Kristina | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
25 | MORO Diana | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
26 | OSTERBAUER Nancy K. | 14% | 41% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.