South Plainfield, NJ - South Plainfield, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 2 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 3 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 3 | HUANG Tyler T. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
| 5 | HU Andrew | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 6 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% |
| 7 | CHIEN Winston L. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 8 | DENG Andrew | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 9 | HONG Vincent Q. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 10 | LEE Aydan J. | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% | |
| 11 | WU Wilmund | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 12 | ROBERTS Justin C. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | SMINK Oliver | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 14 | SHOMAN Noah | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 15 | DA GRACA Aidan | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 16 | PANDEY Neil | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 17 | NOBLE Colin | 4% | 18% | 32% | 28% | 14% | 4% | < 1% |
| 18 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 44% | 21% | |
| 19 | HONG Justin | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 20 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
| 21 | KIM Matthew | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
| 22 | PENG Bryan | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 23 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 24 | BENDERLY Liam | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 25 | CHENG Cody | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 26 | SHTEYN Mark | 2% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 27 | OVERDECK Andrew | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | CHENG Kyle | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 29 | TASIKAS Stylianos | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 30 | HUANG Maxwell H. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 8% |
| 31 | CADAMBI Roshan | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | CHAN Austin | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 33 | VIG Dylan R. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% |
| 34 | FLITSANOV Macabee | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 35 | MOULTON Ian | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | WONG Ryan | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 38 | LEUNG Andrew K. | 7% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | OH Triton | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 40 | DOLAN Charles R. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 3% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | DALAL Rohan | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 43 | BREKHMAN Eric | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | GEORGE Daniel | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 8% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 48 | ZHUANG Rayken | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | LEMPERT Adam | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 50 | LIN Stephen | 47% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | DAI William | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | TONG Luke | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | LIU ALAN | 11% | 48% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.