South Plainfield, NJ - South Plainfield, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% |
| 2 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 3 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 3 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 5 | HU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 6 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 10% |
| 7 | CHIEN Winston L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 8 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 9 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 10 | LEE Aydan J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 45% | 10% | |
| 11 | WU Wilmund | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
| 12 | ROBERTS Justin C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 13 | SMINK Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 14 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
| 15 | DA GRACA Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 9% |
| 16 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 96% | 77% | 46% | 18% | 4% | < 1% |
| 18 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 21% | |
| 19 | HONG Justin | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 20 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
| 21 | KIM Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 22 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 23 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | BENDERLY Liam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 25 | CHENG Cody | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 26 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 27 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 72% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | CHENG Kyle | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 29 | TASIKAS Stylianos | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 30 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 8% |
| 31 | CADAMBI Roshan | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | CHAN Austin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 33 | VIG Dylan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
| 34 | FLITSANOV Macabee | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 35 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | WONG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 38 | LEUNG Andrew K. | 100% | 93% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 40 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 97% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | DALAL Rohan | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 43 | BREKHMAN Eric | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 44 | GEORGE Daniel | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 92% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 48 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | LEMPERT Adam | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 50 | LIN Stephen | 100% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | DAI William | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | TONG Luke | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | LIU ALAN | 100% | 89% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.