Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | MORAIS Paulo | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
2 | MION Lorenzo | V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
3 | FARQUHARSON Cole | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
3 | ZHAO Jason L. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
5 | BOLTON Lucas R. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
6 | ROBINSON Keegan B. | V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
7 | ANDERSON David C. | D D V V V | V V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
8 | LARGAESPADA LUIS V. | D D V V V | V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
9 | KASI Sanjay | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
10 | LEE Chris | V V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
11 | FERNANDES Zain | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
12 | WANG Michael | D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
13 | RINEHART Conner M. | D V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
15 | MANGE Nathan | D V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
16 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | V D V D D | V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
17 | MESSINESE Brando | V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
18 | KONG Kenneth | V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
19 | MCKINNEY Isaiah | V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
20 | HAN Andersen Y. | D V V D V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
21 | HSIUNG Richie | V D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
22 | CHREKY Jacob D. | V D V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
24 | ESTEVES Dionel L. | D V D V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
25 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
26 | ARTIS Tre D. | V V D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
27 | MANGE Andrew (Andrew Mange) E. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
28 | JANSEN Jesse | D V D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
29 | WANG Duke R. | V D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
30 | HARDMAN III Harry C. | V D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
31 | LO Hung Yui | D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
32 | ANGLIN Benjamin S. | V V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
33 | SON Eric | V V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
34 | ZHANG Thales | D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
35 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
36 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | D D V D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
37 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
38 | LEYLAND John | D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
39 | MCINTOSH Michael | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
40 | WILBERT Matt | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
41 | DENMAN Matthew L. | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
43 | VO Jonathan | D D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
44 | PELAN Justin D. | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
45 | GREEN Zachary J. | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
46 | GREEN Scott D. | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
48 | UPTON Craig | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
49 | KIRSHNER Ronald | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
50 | AMES Tucker | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.