Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
2 | SONG Leonardo T. | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 46% | 11% | |
3 | KOBAL Maximilian | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 29% |
3 | JITTAN daniel | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
5 | CHENG Nathan | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
6 | SICHITIU Alexander | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
7 | GATZA Logan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
8 | SAGE Michael J. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
9 | SYLVESTER William Z. | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 33% | 9% | - |
10 | LOVE Aaron | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 43% | 11% | |
11 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 53% | |
12 | ROUNTREE Rob | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 18% |
13 | CUI Anthony | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 35% | 5% |
14 | BEALE Asa G. | - | 12% | 38% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
15 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 33% |
16 | HEARN Christen J. | - | 14% | 40% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
17 | BERNABE Rafael | 3% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
18 | ROSS III Paul D. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% | - |
19 | LONG Connor M. | - | 5% | 28% | 43% | 21% | 3% | |
20 | JACK James | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
21 | YU Jonathan J. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
22 | FRIEDENBERGER Jacob | 2% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
23 | WANG Duke R. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 3% |
24 | BROWN Alexander R. | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
25 | LEE Jacob | 1% | 14% | 41% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
26 | AMMON Blue | 19% | 45% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
27 | EMENHEISER Conrad | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
28 | JONES Nate | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
29 | TUGGY Sam | 4% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
30 | KIM Justin | 48% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
31 | O'CONNOR Kristian | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
31 | KIM Chaemin | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | KNIZHNIK David | 2% | 32% | 43% | 20% | 3% | - | |
34 | COLLUM Thomas | 21% | 48% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
35 | CHOY Spencer Andrew | 26% | 49% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
36 | BUCHENHORST Anton | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
37 | SUERSTEDT Haydn | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
38 | MADDOX Kamden | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
39 | SIGEL Noah | 5% | 41% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
39 | YUAN Austin | 8% | 38% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.