Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
| 2 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 11% | |
| 3 | KOBAL Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 29% |
| 3 | JITTAN daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | |
| 5 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
| 6 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 7 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 8 | SAGE Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 9 | SYLVESTER William Z. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 9% | - |
| 10 | LOVE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 11% | |
| 11 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
| 12 | ROUNTREE Rob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
| 13 | CUI Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | 5% |
| 14 | BEALE Asa G. | 100% | 100% | 87% | 49% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% |
| 16 | HEARN Christen J. | 100% | 100% | 86% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
| 17 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 18 | ROSS III Paul D. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 19 | LONG Connor M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% | 3% | |
| 20 | JACK James | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 21 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 22 | FRIEDENBERGER Jacob | 100% | 98% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | WANG Duke R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 26% | 3% |
| 24 | BROWN Alexander R. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 25 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
| 26 | AMMON Blue | 100% | 81% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 27 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
| 28 | JONES Nate | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | TUGGY Sam | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | KIM Justin | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | O'CONNOR Kristian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 31 | KIM Chaemin | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 98% | 67% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | COLLUM Thomas | 100% | 79% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 35 | CHOY Spencer Andrew | 100% | 74% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 36 | BUCHENHORST Anton | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 37 | SUERSTEDT Haydn | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | MADDOX Kamden | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
| 39 | SIGEL Noah | 100% | 95% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | YUAN Austin | 100% | 92% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.