December NAC

Div I Women's Foil

Saturday, December 15, 2018 at 8:00 AM

Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ROSS Nicole - - 3% 17% 38% 35% 6%
2 TIEU May L. - 1% 6% 23% 42% 29%
3 DUBROVICH Jacqueline - - 1% 6% 22% 41% 30%
3 RYAN Kelleigh E. - 1% 9% 29% 38% 21% 3%
5 ZEISS Madison E. - - 1% 7% 25% 42% 26%
6 DESCHNER Stefani K. - - 1% 7% 26% 42% 23%
7 LEE Morgan A. 1% 9% 26% 35% 23% 6%
8 LAFFEY Jessie S. 1% 5% 22% 38% 28% 6%
9 CHEN Alyssa J. - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
10 MASSIALAS Sabrina C. - 1% 9% 26% 36% 23% 5%
10 DEVORE Delphine P. - - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
12 BOLDOR Maria - - - 3% 18% 46% 33%
13 SCRUGGS Lauren S. - - 1% 7% 33% 60%
14 BLOW Iman (Mani) A. - - 2% 11% 30% 38% 18%
15 TAN Helen 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5%
16 HUNG Juliana K. 2% 14% 34% 35% 14% 1%
17 BINDER Sylvie A. - - - - 5% 30% 64%
18 LU Margaret L.C. - 1% 5% 20% 38% 30% 6%
19 LAM Justina - 3% 14% 32% 36% 15%
20 TAN Elisha - - - 4% 22% 44% 30%
21 PUSTILNIK Nicole - - 2% 15% 40% 42%
22 KNIGHT Skylar - - 1% 10% 30% 40% 19%
23 GONG Christina S. 16% 37% 31% 13% 3% < 1% -
24 CHO Sabrina N. - - 4% 20% 37% 29% 8%
25 HORSLEY Asherah - 3% 13% 29% 33% 18% 3%
26 KARAMETE Irem - 1% 4% 17% 34% 33% 12%
27 LUONG Paige K. - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6%
28 CANDESCU Diana - 5% 19% 35% 29% 11% 1%
29 THOMPSON Julia T. - 1% 6% 22% 38% 28% 4%
30 AHN Gabriella 2% 12% 28% 32% 19% 6% 1%
31 LEE Yejine - 1% 11% 30% 36% 19% 4%
32 MAROTTA Veronica L. 8% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1% -
33 MARINELLI Ever - - - 2% 11% 39% 49%
34 PARTRIDGE Morgan K. - - - 4% 21% 46% 28%
35 HAO Alicia - - 2% 11% 32% 39% 16%
36 FERRARI Christina M. - 1% 12% 39% 37% 10% 1%
37 ZAROFF Roxanne 1% 11% 32% 38% 15% 2% -
38 MARTOS Sara A. - - 2% 11% 31% 39% 17%
39 BREKER Anika - 4% 15% 31% 32% 15% 3%
40 HAO Grace - 3% 13% 29% 33% 18% 3%
42 ALFONSO Czarina M. 3% 17% 34% 30% 13% 2% -
43 MANDOUR Sophia M. 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
44 YANKOVSKIY Anastasia - - 3% 13% 31% 37% 16%
45 STAMOS Maria - 1% 9% 27% 37% 22% 4%
46 SERBAN Samantha M. 1% 8% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
47 PETROVA Kristina - 2% 9% 24% 33% 24% 7%
48 LO Ashley 2% 14% 31% 33% 17% 3%
49 KASI Anisha 3% 18% 38% 30% 10% 1%
50 ANDREYENKA Hanna 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% - -
52 YAROSHENKO Karina - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 17%
53 LEE Annora Y. - - 1% 6% 25% 46% 23%
53 NISHIMURA Madeleine A. 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5% -
55 JIA Amy 3% 17% 34% 30% 13% 3% -
56 FLANAGAN Catherine H. - 1% 4% 16% 32% 34% 14%
56 AHN Isabella 4% 28% 40% 22% 5% 1% -
58 LI Grace Q. 2% 12% 31% 36% 17% 3% -
59 KOO Rachel A. - 1% 5% 19% 37% 31% 8%
60 ADLER Polly Z. 12% 33% 35% 17% 3% -
61 CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. 6% 23% 35% 25% 9% 1%
62 ZHENG Vivian 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2%
63 KOO Haley B. - 2% 12% 31% 35% 16% 3%
64 CROMPTON Celia N. 5% 21% 33% 27% 12% 3% -
65 ANDREYENKA Yana - - 5% 20% 38% 30% 8%
66 CRUM Quinn T. 24% 45% 24% 6% 1% - -
67 RHODES Zander - - - 1% 13% 51% 35%
68 BANIN Isabelle J. 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
69 ZHENG Ivy 3% 15% 30% 30% 17% 5% -
70 PARK Rowan M. 5% 24% 36% 25% 9% 1% -
71 SHEN Jasmine N. 18% 39% 30% 11% 2% -
72 BARNETTE Zoe 3% 18% 34% 30% 13% 2%
73 VIQUEIRA Samantha M. 1% 7% 26% 39% 22% 5% -
74 HARFELD Skylar - 2% 13% 32% 35% 16% 2%
75 MOLHO Sofia 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
76 MCBRYAN Teresa N. - 5% 22% 39% 27% 6% -
76 PARK Alexandra D. - 2% 12% 30% 36% 17% 3%
78 KLEINER Elyssa R. - 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 6%
79 TALAVERA Daena - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6%
80 WANG Karina (Karina Xue Wang) X. - 1% 10% 29% 39% 18% 3%
81 CHAN Stephanie Y. 9% 28% 34% 21% 7% 1% -
82 CHUSID Renata (Renata Chusid) M. - - 1% 9% 28% 41% 20%
83 NOVOSELTSEVA Elizabeth (Liza) M. - 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 2%
84 LEE Alina 1% 9% 28% 36% 21% 5% -
85 ZHANG Rachel 1% 12% 34% 36% 15% 1%
86 KIM Rachael 24% 41% 26% 7% 1% -
87 HOOSHI Erica S. 10% 34% 36% 16% 3% -
88 WONG Tatiana 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
89 APELIAN Katherine 1% 8% 23% 33% 25% 9% 1%
90 BIASCO Anna 1% 7% 23% 35% 25% 7% -
91 TANG Louise - 1% 7% 25% 39% 24% 5%
93 GUO Kaitlyn S. 17% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
93 YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) 1% 8% 26% 36% 22% 6% 1%
95 LAMPSON-STIXRUD Dolly C. 11% 33% 34% 17% 4% - -
96 KOKES Gabrielle 5% 25% 37% 24% 8% 1% -
97 PRILUTSKY Sarah A. - 1% 8% 27% 38% 23% 4%
97 SLOWINSKI Maia A. 2% 11% 27% 33% 21% 6% 1%
99 MASSICK Laine 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
100 SHEN Sophia H. 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
101 RASO Sofia G. 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
102 WEINTRAUB Rei H. 8% 26% 34% 22% 8% 1% -
103 LEE Allison (Allie) 1% 7% 25% 38% 23% 6% 1%
104 FREEDMAN Miranda W. 1% 8% 25% 35% 24% 7% 1%
105 REN Olivia Y. 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% -
106 NORMAN Lillia M. 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 2%
107 SLADE Mycah R. 38% 41% 17% 4% - - -
108 HUNT Tarleton Q. 2% 11% 27% 33% 20% 6% 1%
109 YE Eileen 1% 9% 27% 35% 21% 6% 1%
110 ABAYEVA Sasha 2% 10% 25% 32% 22% 8% 1%
111 SHALANSKY Julia B. 4% 21% 37% 27% 10% 2% -
112 LOW Sharon J. 15% 36% 32% 14% 3% - -
114 GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa 4% 31% 44% 17% 3% - -
115 KELLY Katherine E. 30% 43% 21% 4% - - -
116 NECHANICKY Mackensie J. 5% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
117 SARTORI Taylor M. 14% 37% 33% 13% 2% - -
118 SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. 26% 42% 24% 7% 1% - -
119 VEERKAMP Molly 16% 43% 32% 8% 1% - -
120 HALL Velma 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
121 SHANG Andrea 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
122 GOMES Rafaella T. 30% 41% 22% 6% 1% - -
123 ZUZULO Isabella E. 12% 33% 34% 17% 4% -
123 BHANOT Gayatri 2% 13% 33% 35% 16% 2%
125 PROCOPIO Lucia 12% 32% 33% 18% 5% 1% -
125 KIM Lauren Hyomin 13% 39% 36% 10% 1% - -
127 JING Alexandra 5% 22% 35% 27% 10% 1%
128 MARLEY-WEAVER Jordan 79% 19% 1% - - - -
128 WALKER Mayah J. 1% 15% 40% 32% 10% 1% -
130 MERGES Gretl C. 19% 38% 30% 11% 2% - -
130 TURNER Stephanie E. 45% 40% 13% 2% - - -
132 WU Catherine 3% 23% 41% 26% 7% 1% -
133 PAPADAKIS Lily 2% 15% 34% 32% 14% 3% -
134 VONA Elena M. 23% 43% 26% 7% 1% - -
134 KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) 9% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1% -
136 MING YUE 34% 48% 16% 2% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.