Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JOHNSON Laura S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 16% | |
| 2 | DEMING Clare L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
| 3 | SIERRA Kate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% |
| 3 | OBLONSKY Natalia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 46% | 17% | 3% |
| 5 | TURNER Delia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% |
| 6 | VANCE Beth S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 7 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 8 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | ENOCHS Liz | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 9 | BERMAN Frauke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 72% | 26% |
| 11 | WILSON Dawn J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 12 | DUNN Linda J. J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
| 13 | ALTMAN Leigh | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
| 14 | KNUTSON Theresa S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 2% |
| 15 | MARENTES Blanca E. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | KING Robin E. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | GRAJALES Emily K. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | < 1% |
| 18 | KIM Nam Heui | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 19 | KLEIN-BRADDOCK Kimberly K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 20 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | DEROSE Miyako N. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
| 22 | LAPP Laurie E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 23 | WALTER Joanne | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | FOLEY Eileen | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 25 | WILKERSON Mary B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 26 | GLUCK Myriam | 100% | 81% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | FELDMAN Jill A. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | DEGEN Anita L. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | LUM Karen | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 32 | WEBB Maud | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | DIEGEL Angela E. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 34 | DAHL Naomi V. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | JOHNSON Pamela | 100% | 92% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | TAYLOR BLAKEMORE Kim | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 37 | GORDON Sharon | 100% | 95% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | SCHLIENGER Katia | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | DEANE Dede | 100% | 94% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | MASLEN Cheryl L. | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | HURST Susan E. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.