Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PAVLOVICH Robert | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 2 | WILBERT Matt | D D V D D | V V V V V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 3 | MCCARTHY Daniel (Dan) W. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 3 | DOURAGHY Jamie M. | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 5 | KLEIN Johannes | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | STREB Joseph S. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 7 | MARIANI Lou | V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 8 | GROSS Stephen R. | V D V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | BENNETT Philippe | V V V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 10 | LAWRENCE John W. | D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 11 | DORFMAN Mitchell (Mitch) J. | D V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | MALNATI Donald H. | V D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 13 | CONYARD Anthony | D V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 14 | DELL George H. | D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 15 | KAROLAK Dale W. | V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 16 | DRAKE David L. | V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 17 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 18 | LIM Richard M. | V V D D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | VOELZ Jim | V V D D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 20 | BISCHOFF William B. | V V D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 20 | JOHANSON David B. | V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 22 | RESS Michael A. | V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | CRACRAFT William J. | V V D D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 24 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 25 | MILLIGAN Bruce C. | D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 26 | DAUGHERTY Ron L. | V D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 27 | ZEISS Gary M. | D D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 28 | GLADNICK Michael J. | D D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 29 | POWERS James J. | D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 30 | HAGOPIAN Mitchell | D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | BLAIR III Ray H. | D V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 32 | CAIN Russell (Russ) P. | D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 33 | KIRSHNER Ronald | D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 34 | KEENEY Jeff | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 35 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | D D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 36 | WILLIAMS Theodore | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 37 | SZATHMARY Michael J. | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 37 | BRAINERD Jim | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.