Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAVLOVICH Robert | - | - | 2% | 26% | 54% | 18% | |
| 2 | WILBERT Matt | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 3 | MCCARTHY Daniel (Dan) W. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 3 | DOURAGHY Jamie M. | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 7% | |
| 5 | KLEIN Johannes | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 19% | |
| 6 | STREB Joseph S. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 7 | MARIANI Lou | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
| 8 | GROSS Stephen R. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 9 | BENNETT Philippe | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 27% |
| 10 | LAWRENCE John W. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% | |
| 11 | DORFMAN Mitchell (Mitch) J. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | MALNATI Donald H. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 31% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 13 | CONYARD Anthony | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 14 | DELL George H. | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 15 | KAROLAK Dale W. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 16 | DRAKE David L. | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% | |
| 17 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | - | 1% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 14% | |
| 18 | LIM Richard M. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 19 | VOELZ Jim | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | BISCHOFF William B. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 20 | JOHANSON David B. | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 22 | RESS Michael A. | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 23 | CRACRAFT William J. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 24 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 5% | 34% | 41% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | MILLIGAN Bruce C. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | DAUGHERTY Ron L. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | ZEISS Gary M. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 28 | GLADNICK Michael J. | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | POWERS James J. | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | HAGOPIAN Mitchell | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | BLAIR III Ray H. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CAIN Russell (Russ) P. | 11% | 39% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | KIRSHNER Ronald | 38% | 46% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | KEENEY Jeff | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | WILLIAMS Theodore | 3% | 27% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | SZATHMARY Michael J. | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | BRAINERD Jim | 4% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.