Santa Clara, CA - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Sylvia | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 2 | LEE Isabelle | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 3 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 3 | ALTEN Ayaka | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 5 | CHO Gracie L. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
| 6 | KOROL Neta | - | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 7 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 8 | KOROL Dana | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 10 | SU Alysa J. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | KIM Iris | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 12 | HO Rachel E. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | CUI Melody J. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 14 | PENG Amber L. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 15 | YEH Marissa E. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
| 17 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 18 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 19 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | SU Alena J. | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | KOSLOW Amicie | 1% | 6% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 22 | PANT Anisha | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 23 | TOM Caitlyn | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 24 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 25 | LEE Bethanie | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | |
| 26 | LI Angela | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | HWANG Jungmin | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | OHALLORAN Zoe | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 29 | HSIUNG Samantha | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | UPENDER Cosette K. | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | YIN Helen | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | UMAP Arna | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 33 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | LUO Sandra J. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 35 | LEE Samantha X. | 2% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | NICKOLOV Nora | 48% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | WELBORN Calissa | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | GREEN Perri L. | 34% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | DERMETZIS Adriana | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | CHANG Elizabeth | < 1% | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 41 | ELANGOVAN Mamata | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.