Santa Clara, CA - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG Sylvia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
2 | LEE Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
3 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
3 | ALTEN Ayaka | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
5 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
6 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 3% |
7 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
8 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
9 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
10 | SU Alysa J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
11 | KIM Iris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
12 | HO Rachel E. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
13 | CUI Melody J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
14 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
15 | YEH Marissa E. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
16 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
17 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
18 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
19 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
20 | SU Alena J. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
21 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
22 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
23 | TOM Caitlyn | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
24 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
25 | LEE Bethanie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
26 | LI Angela | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
27 | HWANG Jungmin | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
28 | OHALLORAN Zoe | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
29 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
30 | UPENDER Cosette K. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
31 | YIN Helen | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
32 | UMAP Arna | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
33 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
34 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
35 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 98% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
35 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
37 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
38 | GREEN Perri L. | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
39 | DERMETZIS Adriana | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
40 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
41 | ELANGOVAN Mamata | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.