Santa Clara, CA - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 2 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
| 3 | COELHO Cristiano P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 3 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 5 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 6 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 6% |
| 7 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 29% | 2% |
| 8 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 9 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% | |
| 10 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 19% | |
| 11 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 97% | 75% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 12 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 13 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 5% |
| 14 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | MA Bryant | 100% | 99% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 17 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 9% |
| 18 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 19 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
| 20 | WONG Matthew H. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 21 | LI Jett | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 22 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 23 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | KHER Roan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 25 | MA Andrew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 4% | |
| 26 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 26 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 28 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
| 29 | HUSSAIN Ibrahim | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 98% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CAZALET George | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 34 | NG Micah | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 35 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 17% | 2% |
| 37 | LIU William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 15% | 1% |
| 38 | TAPUS Andrei | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | CHU Colin | 100% | 57% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | PONCIN Sebastian A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 41 | HUSSAIN Ismail A. | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | GREGORY Henry F. | 100% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 43 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 44 | CHENG Marcus | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 47 | SUBRAMANIAM Akilesh | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | CHAN Connor | 100% | 66% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | NGAI Julian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 50 | MCCORMACK WILCOX Braeden | 100% | 70% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | ZHANG Luke | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | RAMOS Owen | 100% | 82% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | HOLLENBECK Walker | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.