Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SMITH Jackson | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
| 2 | EYMAN Hans | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 3 | KISSINGFORD John F. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 3 | EBELL Ivan D. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 5 | HARR Carver | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 6 | KIM Eugene | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 7 | TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 21% | 5% |
| 8 | GOLDMAN Rami | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 9 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 10 | ERKENBECK Nathan M. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 11 | SOLTER Kai | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 12 | WEBER Nora | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 13 | COFFEY Jacob | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 15% | 2% | |
| 14 | LI Patrick | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | COLE Matthew | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 27% | |
| 16 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | MESCHIA Maggie | 15% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 18 | KENT IV David | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 19 | FARICY Aislynn A. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | ANDERSON Jennifer | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 17% | - | |
| 21 | BURCH Tristan H. | 7% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 22 | NIETZER Jo A. | 32% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 23 | SAINT-PHARD Shana | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | SATTERFIELD Donald | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | VARELA Kai | 3% | 19% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | TORRES Nicolas | 8% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.