Central Community Center, Mt. Prospect Park Dist. - Mt. Prospect, IL, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZMYSLOWSKI Maciek A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | NOWAK Jakub P. | V D V V D V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
| 3 | ZEKO David J. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 3 | LENDER David | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 5 | BRENNAN Charles F. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 6 | JUSCINSKI MIchal | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 7 | GLASS Timothy C. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 8 | MILLER Joshua J. | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 9 | STENCEL Andrew E. | V D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 10 | CASTELLANOS Rene E. | D V V V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 11 | VARGAS Colby K. | V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | SWANSON Dave | D V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 13 | WHEELER Mark C. | V D V V D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 14 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 15 | DUNLOP Richard (Dick) M. | V D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 16 | PAPP Mike | D D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 17 | SZPAK Lara K. | V V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 18 | RUETSCHLIN Harry | D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 19 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | D D V D V | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 20 | GUIO Esteban | V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 21 | PRABHAKAR Vibhav | V V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 22 | GRATZ Quinn | V D V D D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 23 | HERBRECHTSMEIER Erik | D D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 24 | DIVERIS Joseph | D V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 25 | NIKOLOV Peter | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 26 | COOK Aaron N. | D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 27 | HENSEL Kaeleb | D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 28 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 29 | GROCE Linda J. | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 30 | COHA Richard A. | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 31 | KNIGHT Jesse | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 32 | AGARWAL Adheesh | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.