Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BATES Sean M. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 2.6 | 6 | +3.4 |
| 2 | BUSH Joshua C. | V V V V D | V V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 3 | MAKOGON Sergey | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | DASHNAW Stephen | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 5 | VIDOVSZKY Tamas J. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 6 | BACON Michael F. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 7 | MATT Chris | V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 8 | PRILUTSKY Stan | D V V D D | V V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 9 | KALLIO Jeffrey E. | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | HERRERA Richard K. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | MONTORIO Louis V. | D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | MIRONOVAS Mikhail (Misha) | V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | LEAR Donald W. | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 14 | PHILLIPS Kim V. | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | GUEBLE Jeffrey R. | D V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 16 | HICHA Paul R. | V V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 17 | KASTOR Jacaeber | V D V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 18 | THORNTON Ronald J. | V V D V V | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 19 | LILLARD Samuel N. | V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 20 | NEVEROVICH Vitaly V. | V V D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 21 | JAKUBEK Zygmunt J. | D D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 22 | YUNG Wang Y. | V V V D D D | D | 5.1 | 3 | -2.1 |
| 23 | PENTON Robert | V D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 24 | ROSENTHAL Paul E. | D D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 25 | KATH Philip (Doc) D. | V D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 26 | MALDARI Frank | D D V D V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 27 | KRASNICH Mike | D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 28 | SRERE Mark A. | D D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 29 | MCLAUGHLIN Joseph R. | D D D V D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 30 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 32 | CAROTHERS Michael B. | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 33 | WILDMAN Steve | V D D D V | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 | |
| 34 | MEHTA Nalin J. | D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 35 | MIGHELL Jason | D D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 36 | BAKER Keith L. | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 37 | TRESTMAN Robert (Bob) L. | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 38 | PARAGANO Vincent | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 39 | DAHL Chris | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 40 | POND III George E. | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 41 | ZINNI Gene | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 42 | HUANG Erich | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 43 | YOWELL Kevin G. | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.