Gryphon Fencing Club - Placentia, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | AMICO Julian F. | - | 7% | 31% | 44% | 17% | |
2 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
3 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | |
3 | JORDON Kaleb W. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
5 | HODESS Ethan | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
6 | ELLIOTT Tyler A. | 20% | 60% | 19% | 1% | - | |
7 | MO Jason | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% | |
8 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
9 | MCCULLOUGH Russell (Rusty) O. | - | 6% | 45% | 49% | ||
10 | LEE Thomas | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
11 | KACZOR Gunnar | - | 6% | 55% | 38% | ||
12 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 2% | 20% | 51% | 24% | 2% | |
13 | LIEBER Derek | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 47% | |
14 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 3% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 6% | |
15 | WONG Ryan S. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
16 | LYMAN Finnian S. | 49% | 44% | 7% | - | ||
17 | HARRIS Rhonen | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
18 | LE Jacob W. | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 9% | |
20 | SAMAHA Nicholas J. | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
21 | FERNANDEZ Theo K. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
22 | PROCOPIO Gregory M. | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
23 | KEENEY Jeff | 13% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
24 | GUO Hairuo | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
25 | MARCUSSEN Rufus M. | - | 2% | 22% | 53% | 24% | |
26 | CHIN Yit-Meng | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
27 | LEE Jaehak | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
28 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 11% | 44% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
29 | LAVERY Ryan | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
30 | KING Andrew | 1% | 13% | 38% | 37% | 11% | |
31 | DUNCAN Nicholas | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
32 | LARRIVEE Benjamin | 38% | 58% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.