Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | FOELLMER Kristin | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 2 | HABERKERN Kundry E. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
| 3 | QUINLAN Nicole P. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 3 | GANSER Yuliya | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 5% |
| 5 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
| 6 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 39% | 9% |
| 7 | HOFMAN Haejung | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 8 | ALLEN Susan B. | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
| 9 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | CHANG Amanda Yen-Shih (Amanda) | 8% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 11 | CLAUSEN Amalie (Amy) | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 12 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 13 | HEINRICH Eva | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 14 | MARSH Janet L. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 15 | GALTO Meredith | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 4% |
| 16 | PETITE Jenny | 46% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | MOHEBI Sue | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 18 | OCHIA Ruth | 3% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | FREY Alison | 12% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 20 | STANICA Teodora O. | 10% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 21 | ROANE D.C. Pixie (Chez Pixie) | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | KUHN April | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 23 | JACOBS Alicia | 14% | 44% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.