Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HABALA Peter | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
2 | GROSSI Stefano | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
3 | BRYAN Thomas A. | 2% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
3 | CHEN David A. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 39% | 8% |
5 | DIAZ Julio P. | 6% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 3% | < 1% | |
6 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
7 | GRANDBOIS Peter R. | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% | |
8 | ESTELL Oscar M. | 2% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
9 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 43% | 16% | |
10 | ANDERSON Kristian S. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 80% |
11 | CHO Michael | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 50% | 32% |
12 | TYSHCHENKO Andrey | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 38% | 8% |
13 | FELDMAN Adam | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% |
14 | MARTOS Darwin C. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
15 | GALLUCH Peter G. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
16 | JOHANSON David B. | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 3% | |
17 | BANKS Alexander S. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 2% |
17 | RITTER Nathan E. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
19 | STRICKLAND Michael C. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
20 | LEE Stephen K. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 47% | 43% |
21 | LAWRENCE John W. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
22 | COTLAR Andrew D. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
23 | DRAKE David L. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - |
24 | DELL George H. | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
25 | VOYIAZIAKIS Emanuel | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | - |
26 | JONES Sam J. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
27 | KOEHN Ted | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
28 | VOELZ Jim | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
29 | PASHBY Stephen N. | 10% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
30 | WILBERT Matt | 20% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
31 | GRISWOLD Doug | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
32 | BLAIR III Ray H. | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
33 | POWERS Douglas A. | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
34 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
35 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
36 | LEYLAND John | 21% | 47% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
37 | HAGOPIAN Mitchell | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
38 | LIM Richard M. | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
39 | SCHWARTZMAN Benjamin | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
40 | SUSSMAN Steven W. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | - |
41 | GLADNICK Michael J. | 6% | 30% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
42 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 12% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
43 | KIRSHNER Ronald | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
44 | YOO Terry S. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
45 | MELCHIOR Donald L. | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
46 | CAIN Russell (Russ) P. | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
47 | PREUD'HOMME Xavier A. | 38% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.