Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HABALA Peter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 2 | GROSSI Stefano | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 3 | BRYAN Thomas A. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 3 | CHEN David A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 8% |
| 5 | DIAZ Julio P. | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 4% | < 1% | |
| 6 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 7 | GRANDBOIS Peter R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 62% | |
| 8 | ESTELL Oscar M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 9 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 16% | |
| 10 | ANDERSON Kristian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
| 11 | CHO Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 32% |
| 12 | TYSHCHENKO Andrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 8% |
| 13 | FELDMAN Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 18% |
| 14 | MARTOS Darwin C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 15 | GALLUCH Peter G. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 16 | JOHANSON David B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 3% | |
| 17 | BANKS Alexander S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% | 2% |
| 17 | RITTER Nathan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 19 | STRICKLAND Michael C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 20 | LEE Stephen K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 43% |
| 21 | LAWRENCE John W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | |
| 22 | COTLAR Andrew D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
| 23 | DRAKE David L. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 24 | DELL George H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 14% | 1% |
| 25 | VOYIAZIAKIS Emanuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 26 | JONES Sam J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 7% | |
| 27 | KOEHN Ted | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 28 | VOELZ Jim | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | PASHBY Stephen N. | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | WILBERT Matt | 100% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | GRISWOLD Doug | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | BLAIR III Ray H. | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | POWERS Douglas A. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 34 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 35 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 36 | LEYLAND John | 100% | 79% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | HAGOPIAN Mitchell | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | LIM Richard M. | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | SCHWARTZMAN Benjamin | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 40 | SUSSMAN Steven W. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | - |
| 41 | GLADNICK Michael J. | 100% | 94% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 100% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | KIRSHNER Ronald | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 44 | YOO Terry S. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | MELCHIOR Donald L. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | CAIN Russell (Russ) P. | 100% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 47 | PREUD'HOMME Xavier A. | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.