Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | GOOSSENS Bruno | - | - | 2% | 19% | 47% | 33% |
2 | SPAHN Jeff | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
3 | TYSON Julian F. | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 68% |
3 | HEWITT Frank F. | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 1% |
5 | DOUGLAS Michael A. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
6 | BLAKLEY Dwain | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% |
7 | BRONZO Thomas E. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
8 | CAMPANA, SR. Rinaldo A. | 3% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
9 | PARY Theodore | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 10% |
10 | JEFFERIES Jonathan J. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
11 | CAMPE Kazimieras M. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
12 | BRYKCZYNSKI (BRICKER) James V. | 1% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
13 | FLINT James E. | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
14 | HENRY Mark R. | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
15 | KATOPES Peter | 11% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
16 | SCHAEFER Ray | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
17 | VITOUX Michael E. | - | 1% | 14% | 49% | 36% | |
18 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | |
19 | CALDERON Peter J. | 2% | 13% | 40% | 41% | 4% | |
20 | SATTERWHITE William W. | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
21 | MATTHEWS John (Doc) C. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
22 | REA John P. | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
23 | MESSING Arnold | 7% | 37% | 41% | 13% | 1% | |
24 | DUFFY Gerald | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
25 | MEHALL Michael | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
26 | MIERNIK marcel | 4% | 27% | 45% | 21% | 3% | - |
27 | BALDWIN Robert (Bob) C. | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
28 | BIANCHINI Victor (Vic) E. | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
29 | DUNLOP Richard (Dick) M. | 8% | 35% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.