Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | ZUCKER Noah L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 44% | 47% |
2 | LICHTEN Keith H. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
3 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - |
3 | PHO Eric | 1% | 15% | 43% | 35% | 6% | |
5 | TOOMEY Brian L. | - | 4% | 29% | 44% | 21% | 2% |
6 | ALLEN Graham | - | 12% | 40% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
7 | MARSH Timothy G. | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% |
8 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 44% | 10% |
9 | WILKINSON Derek H. | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
10 | POPPER Luca G. | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% |
11 | KALAPASEV Nenad (Ned) (Ned) S. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
12 | FOLEY Kevin | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
13 | YAO Shun | 4% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 4% | - |
14 | WILSON Jeffrey M. | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 45% | 15% |
15 | BARREIRO Darren | - | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
16 | ASHER Andrew D. | 13% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
17 | HARRIS Robert S. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
18 | GERACI Paul A. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% |
19 | DAZEY Jason T. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
20 | SANTOS Felipe | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - |
21 | RESHEIDAT Shadi | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 26% | |
22 | KLINE R. Jay | 2% | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - |
23 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | 15% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
24 | KIM Brad K. | 19% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
25 | GERSEN Jacob | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
26 | STEPHEN Dennis L. | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
27 | RHEA Eric L. | 33% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | |
28 | BERMENDER Eric | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
29 | HERBEL Dellas O. | 21% | 42% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.