Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | MASSICK Laine | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
2 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
3 | SLOWINSKI Maia A. | V D V D V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
3 | ZHENG Ivy | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
5 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
6 | MOLHO Sofia | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
7 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
8 | HALL Velma | D D V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
9 | WU Catherine | V V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
10 | YE Eileen | V D V V V V | V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
11 | RASO Sofia G. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
12 | PAPADAKIS Lily | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
13 | GOMES Rafaella T. | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
14 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
16 | VEERKAMP Molly | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
17 | KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) | V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
18 | VONA Elena M. | V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
19 | WANG Ellen | V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
20 | PROCOPIO Lucia | V D V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
21 | SLADE Mycah R. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
22 | KELLY Katherine E. | V V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
23 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
24 | SHANG Andrea | D V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
25 | DEBACK Greta I. | D V V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
26 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | V V V D D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
27 | BRENNER Ellie (Pokenator) | V D D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
28 | HENDRIAN Rachel M. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
29 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | V D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
30 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | V D D D D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
31 | UPTON Elizabeth | V D V D D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
32 | HIRSCH Gabriella H. | D D V D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
33 | SHORTALL Samantha | D V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
34 | MING YUE | D V V D V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
35 | ZIMBALIST Lila | V D D V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
36 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | V V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
37 | OWEN Ashley | V D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
38 | VIANNA Gabriella | V D V D V D | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
39 | FELLMAN Sara | D D D V V | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
40 | RUSCITELLI Kristen A. | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
41 | SCHATZ Erika J. | D V D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
42 | LEE Alison | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
43 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
44 | SIMPSON Lydia Q. | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
45 | ZHEN Ellen | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
46 | HAZEL Susan L. | D D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
47 | YANIV Liya | D D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
48 | BISCHOFF Lydia M. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
49 | HIRSCH Alyssa J. | D D D D D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 | |
51 | SCHWARTZMAN Salma | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
52 | NGUYEN Lisa D. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
53 | SURI Nitya | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
54 | KNOPF Jenna G. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
55 | PRATT Allison Q. | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.