Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MASSICK Laine | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 2 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
| 3 | SLOWINSKI Maia A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 3 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 5 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 6 | MOLHO Sofia | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 7 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 8 | HALL Velma | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 9 | WU Catherine | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 10 | YE Eileen | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 11 | RASO Sofia G. | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 23% |
| 12 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 13 | GOMES Rafaella T. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 16 | VEERKAMP Molly | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 17 | KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 39% | 11% | |
| 18 | VONA Elena M. | - | 3% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 5% | |
| 19 | WANG Ellen | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
| 20 | PROCOPIO Lucia | - | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 4% |
| 21 | SLADE Mycah R. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 22 | KELLY Katherine E. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
| 23 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | - | - | 5% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 3% |
| 24 | SHANG Andrea | - | - | 7% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 2% |
| 25 | DEBACK Greta I. | 1% | 9% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 26 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 27 | BRENNER Ellie (Pokenator) | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | HENDRIAN Rachel M. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 2% |
| 29 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | - | 8% | 45% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | - | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | UPTON Elizabeth | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 32 | HIRSCH Gabriella H. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | SHORTALL Samantha | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | MING YUE | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ZIMBALIST Lila | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 36 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | OWEN Ashley | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | VIANNA Gabriella | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 39 | FELLMAN Sara | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | RUSCITELLI Kristen A. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 41 | SCHATZ Erika J. | 5% | 49% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | LEE Alison | 7% | 47% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | 1% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | SIMPSON Lydia Q. | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | ZHEN Ellen | 21% | 45% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 46 | HAZEL Susan L. | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 47 | YANIV Liya | 36% | 55% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
| 48 | BISCHOFF Lydia M. | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | HIRSCH Alyssa J. | 3% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 51 | SCHWARTZMAN Salma | 51% | 44% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | NGUYEN Lisa D. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | SURI Nitya | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | KNOPF Jenna G. | 13% | 45% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | PRATT Allison Q. | 88% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.